I The normalizing constant in a gamma distribution

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Trollfaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Trollfaz
Messages
143
Reaction score
14
Wikipedia and some of my simpler statistics courses present the gamma distribution with shape ##\alpha## and rate ##\lambda## as

$$P(X=x)=x^{\alpha-1}\lambda^\alpha e^{-\lambda x} \Gamma(\alpha)$$

Where ##\Gamma(\alpha)## is a value in terms of alpha to normalize the PDF from the space of x from 0 to ##\infty## (i.e make it's integral in the space 1).
I have derived that for integral values of ##\alpha##,
$$\Gamma(\alpha)=\frac{1}{(\alpha-1)!}$$
But how about non integral values of alpha? How do I get the ##\Gamma## constant?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_distribution
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Someone please help with the LaTex it's not working thanks
 
I think you derived that equation for Gamma wrong. It is a well known extension of the factorial: ##\Gamma(n)=(n-1)!## for positive integers ##n##, and in general, ##\Gamma(z)=\int_0^\infty t^{z-1}e^{-t} dt## for ##z## in the right half of the complex plane. (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function )
There are tables and computer functions to get values.
 
FactChecker said:
I think you derived that equation for Gamma wrong
Both your formula and mine results in the same final expression
$$P(X=x)=e^{-\lambda x}\lambda^n x^{n-1}/(n-1)!$$
But what if n is non integral or is it not possible for n to be non integral
 
Trollfaz said:
Both your formula and mine results in the same final expression
$$P(X=x)=e^{-\lambda x}\lambda^n x^{n-1}/(n-1)!$$
But what if n is non integral or is it not possible for n to be non integral
By the integral definition @FactChecker gave you i post #3 or by the Wikipedia page about the Gamma function.

Here is a nice paper about the Gamma distribution:
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/18-443-...924817d33e1ccb6f3a6b944c985d0cdb_lecture6.pdf
It directly starts with that definition.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top