The Observable Universe ve The Universe

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the concept of a finite but unbounded universe, suggesting that if the universe is smaller than the observable universe, distant galaxies might be duplicate images of nearby ones due to light circumnavigating the universe. This hypothesis is difficult to test because different images would represent different eras in a galaxy's history. A study by Bielewicz et al. claims a lower bound of 27.9 gigaparsecs for the diameter of the last scattering surface, indicating the universe could be much larger or even infinite. Participants clarify that the balloon analogy illustrates how a finite, unbounded universe could allow for repeated observations of the same structures, although current observations do not support this. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of understanding cosmic structures and the implications of the observable universe.
Nugso
Gold Member
Messages
170
Reaction score
10
Hello everyone. As I was reading an article on wiki, I stumbled upon this by chance;

If the universe is finite but unbounded, it is also possible that the universe is smaller than the observable universe. In this case, what we take to be very distant galaxies may actually be duplicate images of nearby galaxies, formed by light that has circumnavigated the universe. It is difficult to test this hypothesis experimentally because different images of a galaxy would show different eras in its history, and consequently might appear quite different. Bielewicz et al.:[13] claims to establish a lower bound of 27.9 gigaparsecs (91 billion light-years) on the diameter of the last scattering surface (since this is only a lower bound, the paper leaves open the possibility that the whole universe is much larger, even infinite). This value is based on matching-circle analysis of the WMAP 7 year data. This approach has been disputed.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable_universe#cite_note-14)

Can anybody please explain the information above to me? I tried checking the references, but they didn't help me.
 
Space news on Phys.org
I don't really know what you are asking. Do you understand the concept of a finite but unbounded universe?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
See the Balloon analogy thread.
A finite, unbounded universe can look a bit like the surface of earth. If you go in one direction long enough, you will reach your original position again (on earth, after ~40000km). The same could be true for light in the universe. We would see the same objects/structures in multiple directions. We do not, so apparently the universe is not smaller than the volume we call "observable universe".
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Yes, kind of. Thanks to balloon analogy. What I'm pondering over is how the the text above can be possible?

@mfb

"We would see the same objects/structures in multiple directions."

Assuming I'm walking aroun the surface of earth, how could that happen? And also how do we know we don't know see the same objects/structures.Thanks by the by!
 
Nugso said:
Yes, kind of. Thanks to balloon analogy.

Then you have misunderstood the balloon analogy. It has nothing to do with whether the universe if finite/infinite and bounded/unbounded. I recommend the link in my signature.
 
Nugso said:
Assuming I'm walking aroun the surface of earth, how could that happen?
You don't have to walk, light is coming towards you.

And also how do we know we don't know see the same objects/structures.
They would look the same?
Okay, more seriously, this would have been observed as structures in the cosmic microwave background.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K