The Orbital and Spin Momenta of Light

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kderakhshani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Orbital Spin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the expressions for the angular momentum of electromagnetic radiation, specifically the orbital angular momentum (L) and the spin angular momentum (S). The key formula used is J = ε_0 ∫_V r × [E(r, t) × B(r, t)] d^3 r, which is manipulated using vector calculus identities. The final derivation confirms that the total angular momentum J can be expressed as the sum of L and S, with the assumption that the fields vanish at the boundary of the volume V.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, particularly angular momentum in EM fields.
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, including vector products and integration by parts.
  • Knowledge of the vector potential in electromagnetism.
  • Basic concepts of classical and quantum optics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular momentum in electromagnetic fields using the vector potential.
  • Explore the implications of the spin and orbital angular momentum in quantum optics.
  • Learn about the role of boundary conditions in electromagnetic field theory.
  • Investigate the applications of angular momentum in modern physics, such as in optical tweezers and quantum information.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, optical engineers, and students of electromagnetism who are interested in the theoretical foundations and applications of angular momentum in light.

kderakhshani
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

In most classical or quantum optics texts an angular momentum is considered for the EM radiation as the following:

J = ε_0 ∫_V r × [E(r, t) × B(r, t)] d^3 r

Then it is claimed that:

"Using the usual formula for a double vector product and integrating by parts, bearing in
mind the assumption that the fields are zero at the surface of volume V introduced for the
mode expansion, one finds that JR can be written as a sum of two terms:

J = L + S ,
given by
L = ε_0 ∑_{j=(x,y,z)} ∫d^3r Ej (r, t)(r × ∇)Aj (r, t) ,
S = ε_0 ∫d^3r E(r, t) × A(r, t)
"

Would you please help me derive them?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi kderakhshani,

The expressions of L and S include the vector potential. So, first, let's use the vector potential,
J=\epsilon_0 \int_Vr\times[E\times [\nabla \times A]]d^3 r.
We can proceed by using the formula a\times(b\times c)=b(a\cdot c)-c(a\cdot b). There are two possibilities, a=r or a=E. After some consideration, it seems that the former is the right way to go,
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> J&amp;=\epsilon_0 \int_Vr\times[ E_j \nabla A_j -E_j \nabla_j A ]d^3 r,\\<br /> &amp;=L+\epsilon_0 \int_Vr\times[ -E_j \nabla_j A ]d^3 r,\\<br /> &amp;=L+\epsilon_0 \int_V [-E_j \nabla_j (r\times A)+E\times A ]d^3 r,\\<br /> &amp;=L+S+\epsilon_0 \int_V [-E_j \nabla_j (r\times A) ]d^3 r,<br /> \end{align}<br />
where I omit the summation symbol.
After the integration by parts, we have
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> J&amp;=L+S+\epsilon_0 \int_V [(\nabla_j E_j )(r\times A) ]d^3 r,\\<br /> &amp;=L+S+0,<br /> \end{align}<br />
where we assume there is no charge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
546
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K