The Photoelectric Effect, Photon Duality, and The Double-Slit Experiment

  • Thread starter uby
  • Start date
  • #1
uby
176
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hi everyone,

Thanks in advance for any insights you might be able to lead me to.

The photoelectric effect is a well known phenomenon where an incident photon of some energy can stimulate the emission of an electron when absorbed, so long as the energy of the photon can promote an electron beyond the fermi level to the vacuum level of the material.

Photons can also be regarded as waves, having an energy that is spread out over a statistical area until it interacts with a particle. In the double-slit experiment, photons (as well as other massive particles) have been shown to diffract and show interference patterns on a detector screen when going through a double slit. The famous result of the disappearance of this interference pattern when trying to observe which slit the photon travels through is something I've always admired.

Coming back to the photoelectric effect, have any experiments been done to show a similar phenomenon in trying to "observe" where electrons are emitted and thus where photons are being absorbed? The motivating thought behind this is that if the photon acts as a wave prior to interaction with anything, and suddenly behaves as a discrete particle once it interacts with an electron in the material, it should be possible to detect the location of this interaction. Would this alter the photoelectric effect, since it too is reliant on diffraction? I realize the processes are not exactly parallel, but I would like to think that a similar phenomenon could be seen and, possibly, put to use for real-world applications.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
uby
176
0
Sorry, can this be moved to the Quantum forum? Not sure how it got here! Thanks
 
  • #3
dx
Homework Helper
Gold Member
2,011
18
Even when the photons interfere with each other in the slit experiment, they still arrive at the screen as photons, i.e. discrete packets of energy. That is the only thing that matters in the explanation for the photoelectric effect. Whether they were observed or not before the interaction with the electron, and whether the motion before the interaction was wave like or particle like doesn't matter because the exchange of energy with the electrons is still in packets.
 
  • #4
uby
176
0
thanks for your reply dx. but i'm not sure i'm satisfied with the explanation.

in the double slit experiment, sending a single photon through the slit will still cause interference with itself. it's position on the detector (averaged over many photons) CHANGES with the process of observation.

could the same effect also occur with the photoelectric effect? ie - observation changes the spatial distribution of interaction between the energy packet and an electron?
 
  • #5
dx
Homework Helper
Gold Member
2,011
18
Sure. If you replace the screen in the double slit experiment with a metallic surface, then the places where the electrons are emitted from are just the places where the photons hit the material.
 
  • #6
uby
176
0
thanks again dx. to be sure i understand then: if no act of observation takes place, the photoemission of electrons from the conducting surface would occur much like the scattering through the double slit - ie, the spatial orientation of electrons striking a detector would form an interference pattern. however, if an act of observation would occur, the spatial orientation of photoemitted electrons would appear like that of a determined path-of-flight average.

this would seem like a useful effect: changing the behavior of a material based upon observation. for example, in a solar cell that employs the photoelectric effect to generate electricity, the performance of the collector could be enhanced if the spatial distribution of electrons could be controlled.
 

Related Threads on The Photoelectric Effect, Photon Duality, and The Double-Slit Experiment

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
323
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
10K
Replies
23
Views
338
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Top