The Pollution of Batteries: Tax Implications

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Batteries
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the environmental and social implications of battery usage, particularly in mobile devices and vehicles. Participants explore the idea of reallocating taxes from automobiles to batteries, while also sharing personal anecdotes and experiences related to battery use and communication.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express strong views on batteries being highly polluting and socially intrusive, suggesting that taxes should be redirected from automobiles to batteries, excluding those used for medical devices.
  • Others share personal experiences with battery usage, indicating a reliance on batteries for various devices, which leads to a discussion about the prevalence of batteries in everyday life.
  • A participant recounts an incident where a battery shorted on their desk, raising concerns about battery safety and potential hazards.
  • There are comments about the challenges of face-to-face communication in a world dominated by mobile devices, with some expressing a desire for more direct interactions.
  • Technical details about battery specifications and performance are introduced, with participants discussing the implications of different battery ratings and types.
  • Some participants reflect on their reading habits and preferences for using candles, leading to a light-hearted exchange about the impact of light on vision.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the implications of battery use, with no clear consensus on the proposed tax reallocation or the overall impact of batteries on society and the environment.

Contextual Notes

Participants' claims about battery pollution and safety are based on personal experiences and anecdotal evidence, with no formal studies or data presented to support these assertions. The discussion includes a variety of battery types and their uses, highlighting the complexity of the topic.

  • #31
cyrusabdollahi said:
1C is one times the battery capacity. So 12C continuous, is 8000mAH * 12 = 8.0A *12 = 96A under normal conditions.

RC has a funny nomenclature. I know, ...made me say WTF at first too.
That is just the wackoest system I've come across.

The burst is for under 60 seconds, at 144 Amps!
Yikes, 13 gauge wire isn't rated to carry more than 30A! Even at 96A, you'd most likely melt off the insulation. At 144A, that's almost certainly a fire starter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K