B The Possibility of Induced Quantum Mechanical Tunneling?

Pau
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I apologize if the answer to this question is more simple than I am able to realize, but I've searched the internet and haven't found much on the possibility of inducing quantum mechanical tunneling. Is it possible to affect the probability of this event without altering the object's mass or the distance to its objective? Thanks for any input.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes change the barrier thickness and or energy.

You have already done this thousands of times whenever you save something on flash memory. It is induced tunnel although that term is not used.

Note not all memory devices work like this.
 
houlahound said:
Yes change the barrier thickness and or energy.

You have already done this thousands of times whenever you save something on flash memory. It is induced tunnel although that term is not used.

Note not all memory devices work like this.
Sorry, by distance to objective I believe i meant barrier thickness as well. Is there any other factor?
 
Pau said:
Is it possible to affect the probability of this event without altering the object's mass or the distance to its objective?
Yes.

You calculate the tunnelling probability from the distance, the initial conditions, and the potential that appears in the Hamiltonian, and many things other than the object's mass enters into the Hamiltonian. Change the initial conditions, height and/or shape of the potential barrier and you will get different tunnelling probabilities.

(I have changed the thread level from I to B)
 
Awesome, thanks!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top