Does decoherence prevent 100% of quantum tunneling of macro object?

In summary, the article explores whether decoherence can completely prevent quantum tunneling in macroscopic objects. It discusses how decoherence, which involves the loss of quantum coherence due to interactions with the environment, does reduce the probability of tunneling but does not eliminate it entirely. The phenomenon is analyzed within the context of quantum mechanics, emphasizing that while decoherence plays a significant role in suppressing tunneling events, it cannot fully negate the underlying quantum mechanical principles that allow for tunneling to occur, even in larger systems.
  • #1
Kinker
18
1
TL;DR Summary
Does quantum decoherence absolutely prevent quantum tunneling of macroscopic objects?
(Decoherence) macro world and quantum world difference
Isn't the quantum tunneling probability of macroscopic objects always zero due to quantum decoherence? It may be possible in the microscopic world, but I always think it is impossible in the macroscopic world due to countless interactions. Isn't this the same in a universe with infinite time? So isn't the probability of a macroscopic object tunneling by chance always zero, regardless of the duration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Kinker said:
So isn't the probability of a macroscopic object tunneling by chance always zero, regardless of the duration?
No, it is a very very small non-zero probability.

Consider a similar purely classical setup: There is a table sitting on the floor in front of me, my feet are resting on it. The air molecules above and below it are randomly bouncing around from thermal motion. There is a very very small non-zero probability that all the air molecules above and below the table will just randomly happen to all be moving upwards at the same moment, and if this happens the table will blast its way through the roof like an artillery shell, ripping my feet off and leaving me with bloody stumps at the ends of my legs. The probability of this happening is something like ##2^{(10^{24})}##, we are comfortable saying that it's not going to happen.

The probability of a chair-sized macroscopic object tunneling through a wall is much much less than that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Quantum Waver and Demystifier
  • #3
Nugatory said:
No, it is a very very small non-zero probability.

Consider a similar purely classical setup: There is a table sitting on the floor in front of me, my feet are resting on it. The air molecules above and below it are randomly bouncing around from thermal motion. There is a very very small non-zero probability that all the air molecules above and below the table will just randomly happen to all be moving upwards at the same moment, and if this happens the table will blast its way through the roof like an artillery shell, ripping my feet off and leaving me with bloody stumps at the ends of my legs. The probability of this happening is something like ##2^{(10^{24})}##, we are comfortable saying that it's not going to happen.

The probability of a chair-sized macroscopic object tunneling through a wall is much much less than that.
Does that mean that macroscopic objects can also accidentally experience quantum coherence?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
@Kinker You are trying to distinguish between the propositions “It could happen but it won’t” and “It can’t happen”. I’m not sure they are distinguishable.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
7K
Back
Top