MHB The Probability of a Biased Coin: n Flips, m Heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter markosheehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
the probability of getting a head on flipping a biased coin is p. the coin is flipped n times producing a sequence containing m heads and (n-m) tails what is the probability of obtaining this sequence from n flips.
i can't understand the wording
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I've moved this thread since our advanced forum is for calculus based stats.

A few things we need to observe:

The probability of getting heads is:

$$P(H)=p$$

Now, we know that it is certain that we will either get heads or tails, so we may state:

$$P(H)+P(T)=1\implies P(T)=1-P(H)=1-p$$

So, the probability of getting $m$ heads is:

$$P\left(H_m\right)=p^m$$

And the probability of getting $n-m$ tails is:

$$P\left(T_{n-m}\right)=(1-p)^{n-m}$$

Next we need to look at the number $N$ of ways to choose $m$ from $n$:

$$N={n \choose m}$$

Can you put all this together to find the requested probability?
 
when i put this all together i get (n ncr m)*p*(1-p)^n-m however at the back of the book it says the answer is p^m(1-p)^n-m
 
What I get is:

$$P(X)={n \choose m}p^m(1-p)^{n-m}$$

And this agrees with the binomial probability formula. :D

This is the probability of getting any sequence with $m$ heads, for any particular such sequence, then it would be:

$$P(X)=p^m(1-p)^{n-m}$$
 
markosheehan said:
when i put this all together i get (n ncr m)*p*(1-p)^n-m however at the back of the book it says the answer is p^m(1-p)^n-m
Was it possible that the problem asked for the probability of m heads in a row followed by n-m tails in a row? As MarkFl said, that probability if for any particular such sequence- "m heads in a row followed by n- m tails in a row" or "n- m tails in a row followed by m heads in a row" or "A head, then a tail, then a head, followed by m- 2 heads in a row, followed by n- m- 1 tails in a row", etc.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top