The probability of objects spec Q out of infinite variables

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the statistical probabilities of an object's qualities emerging from infinite variable states. It argues that while an event may occur once, the likelihood of it happening again in exactly the same way is extremely low, approaching zero. The concept of infinite possibilities does not guarantee the repetition of specific outcomes, as each occurrence is unique due to the infinite nature of potential events. The analogy of a three-dimensional drunkard's walk illustrates that even with infinite time, certain outcomes may never repeat. Ultimately, the conclusion is that originality in structures ensures that no event can be non-unique in any significant way.
corbensown
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Statistical probabilities of a objects qualities as is emerging out of infinite variable states.

Can an equal emergence occur again, and as a unavoidable fact of infinites result in endless occurrences, given infinite chance in an eternal cosmos?

I say no. If the (falsely inferred as) 1/infinitey chance happens once it is not really unusual. The fault is in thinking this is like any probability solving problem. There is a 100% chance that a thing you see came to exist as itself in everyway. Just as its 100% chance that the cowboys did beat the bills in 2 past bowls. It is guaranteed sure that the presents exact qualities are what they are now and were emerging as at all times in result of any numbers of events and infinitive potentialities.

Now a second equal event that happens after or in parallel with the original is a statistical non event. The chance of it never being is the % 99.999... Repeating 9 decimal. Which is equal to 100% not possible.

That's easy to show as equal by taking 1 divide by three for .3333 repeating 3 decimal. Multiply by 3 to get .9999...etc three times a third is a whole.

So even in an infinite universe there is originality in structures and as a consequence nothing can be non unique in some minuet way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K