The question is: Where does the blasius friction factor formula come from?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Blasius friction factor formula, expressed as f = 0.079*Re^-0.25, is applicable for turbulent flows with Reynolds numbers between 4,000 and 100,000, particularly in air systems. This formula, derived from the Blasius equation, provides an estimation of the friction factor but may lack accuracy at higher Reynolds numbers. The discussion highlights the relationship between average pipe velocity and friction factor, emphasizing the significance of the Darcy-Friction Factor (Λ) in turbulent pipe flow analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of turbulent flow dynamics
  • Familiarity with Reynolds number calculations
  • Knowledge of Darcy-Friction Factor (Λ) and its significance
  • Basic principles of fluid mechanics and pipe flow
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and applications of the Blasius equation in fluid dynamics
  • Explore the Prandtl friction factor formula and its differences from the Blasius equation
  • Learn about the law of the wall and its implications for turbulent flow analysis
  • Investigate methods for calculating average velocity in pipe flow systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid mechanics students, and professionals involved in hydraulic design and analysis, particularly those focusing on turbulent flow in piping systems.

Libertiene
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
"blasius" Friction factor

I am trying to find out if the formula below can be used to estimate the friction factor for turbulent flows with Reynolds number around 100,000, in an air system.

f = 0.079*RE^-0.25

I have not been able to find this exact formula anywhere other than on this website http://www.seykota.com/rm/friction/friction.htm which states that it is valid for 4000<Re<100000.

The above formula has been called the "blasius equation" so maybe it has been derived from it in some way? I think that if this formula works it can't be that accurate.

Does anyone know where this comes from? Or prove it?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


The Blasius and Prandlt formulas differ quite a bit at large Reynolds numbers, so for completeness, here is the Prandlt derivation.

With a profile known (assuming pipe flow here), the average pipe velocity can be calculated:
<br /> u_{av} = \frac{Q}{A} = \frac{1}{\pia^2}\int^a_0\bar{u}2\pi r\,dr = \frac{1}{a^2}\int^a_0 \bar{u}2(a-y)\,dy
Turbulent pipe flow has very little wake. Therefore, the law of the wall is accurate all the way across the pipe. If we then neglect the (very thin) viscous sublayer and substitute the simple log-law, then:
<br /> u_{av} = v^*\left(\frac{1}{k}ln\frac{av^*}{\nu} + B - \frac{3}{2k}\right)<br />
From the definition of pipe-friction factor
<br /> C_f = 2\tau_w / \rho u^2_{av}
The following hold:
<br /> \begin{equation}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \frac{u_{av}}{v^*} &amp;= \left(\frac{2}{C_f}\right)^{1/2} \\<br /> \frac{av^*}{\nu} &amp;= Re_D\left(\frac{C_f}{8}\right)^{1/2} \\<br /> Re_D &amp;= \frac{2au_{av}}{\nu}<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation}<br />
Realizing that the previosu equation for average velocity is actually a friction factor relation, we introduce base-10 logs, and clean up for:
<br /> \frac{1}{\Lambda^{1/2}} = 1.99\log_{10}(Re_D\Lambda^{1/2}) - 1.02<br />
Where
<br /> \Lambda = 4C_f<br />
Is the Darcy-Friction Factor. Since Prandtl neglected the sublayer and wake, he slightly adjusted the cosntants to better fir the pipe-friction data, particularly at low Reynolds. The final form is:
<br /> \frac{1}{\Lambda^{1/2}} = 2.0\log_{10}(Re_D\Lambda^{1/2})-0.8<br />
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
25K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
34K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K