Where does this formula for absorption cross section come from?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The formula for absorption cross section, given by $$\sigma_a =\frac {1} {| \mathbf E_i|^2} \int_V k \epsilon^{''}_r | \mathbf {E} |^2 dV = k \epsilon^{''}_r |\frac 3 {\epsilon_r +2}|^2 V$$, originates from the Clausius-Mossotti formula for electrostatic fields in a dielectric sphere. This approximation is valid under Rayleigh scattering conditions, where the wavelength exceeds the sphere's radius. The variables in the formula represent the imaginary part of the relative permeability ($\epsilon_r''$), the volume of the sphere (V), the wavenumber of light (k), and the amplitude of the incident electric field ($E_i$).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Clausius-Mossotti relation
  • Familiarity with Rayleigh scattering principles
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic wave properties
  • Basic concepts of dielectric materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Clausius-Mossotti formula in Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" (3rd edition, equation 4.56)
  • Explore the relationship between absorption and scattering cross sections in Mie scattering theory
  • Research the implications of the imaginary part of relative permeability in electromagnetic wave absorption
  • Investigate the conditions under which electrostatic approximations are valid in scattering theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetic theory, scattering phenomena, and dielectric materials.

Haorong Wu
Messages
419
Reaction score
90
TL;DR
Where does this formula of absorption cross section come from?
My professor gave us a formula for absorption cross section, but he said he did not remember where he found it.

The formula is given by

$$\sigma_a =\frac {1} {| \mathbf E_i|^2} \int_V k \epsilon^{''}_r | \mathbf {E} |^2 dV = k \epsilon^{''}_r |\frac 3 {\epsilon_r +2}|^2 V.$$

Where does this formula come from? I want to know what those variables stand for.

He gave this formula just after the formula of Rayleigh scattering cross section. It seems these two equations are related somehow, because he also gave the counterpart-formulars in Mie scattering theory.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Haorong Wu said:
My professor gave us a formula for absorption cross section, but he said he did not remember where he found it.

This made me giggle and made my soul hurt at the same time.

This looks like what you'd get if you took the imaginary part of the Clausius-Mossotti formula for electrostatic fields in a dielectric sphere (see Jackson, 3rd edition equation 4.56 and the derivation leading up to it). I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that this formula you gave is an electrostatic approximation for the absorption cross section of a dielectric sphere. The electrostatic approximation is valid when the wavelength is much larger than the radius of the sphere (Rayleigh scattering). In that scenario, the electric field due to the wave is approximately constant over the whole volume of the sphere, so you can use the Clausius-Mossotti formula (which assumes uniform fields).

As far as the symbols go, the standard conventions say:
##\epsilon_r''## ought to be the imaginary part of the relative permeability (the real part would be ##\epsilon_r'##) (phyiscally, the imaginary part corresponds to absorption of the EM wave by the material. If the permeability was entirely real, it'd just reflect or refract the light per the Fresnel equations)
V here is just the volume of the sphere
k is the wavenumber of the light
##E_i## is just the amplitude of the incident electric field
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K