B The Redness of Red: fact or fiction?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr Wu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fiction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether colors, specifically red, are objectively perceived or subjective constructs. While red light has a frequency of 650nm, this does not fully explain the experience of "redness" as perceived by humans. Neuroscientists argue that colors are merely phantom sensations created by the brain's processing of visual signals, rather than inherent properties of light. The brain interprets input from RGB sensors in the eyes, which can vary in sensitivity among individuals, including those with color deficiencies. Ultimately, the perception of color is a complex interplay between physical light properties and neurological processing.
Dr Wu
Messages
183
Reaction score
42
This question has been bothering me for sometime now: do we actually see colours? The colour red, for instance, has the frequency of 650nm, but does this explain its "redness" as experienced by humans? Many neuroscientists suggest this is just a phantom, that colours are subjective constructs, nothing more. What do physicists think?

And what about this?

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...lour-illusion-the-dress-blue-black-gold-white
 
Science news on Phys.org
Light has only the property of frequency and polarisation, there is physically nothing "red" about light. How our brain processes the incoming signals from our eyes is something totally different, these are neuro signals processed by the visual cortex.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Dr Wu and russ_watters
It looks as if the eye has RGB sensors and just compares the output of each. People with colour deficiency have differing sensitivities of these sensors, yet may describe what they see by colour names. No doubt the brain does not care what the actual sensitivities of the sensors are and just compares the three signals.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Dr Wu
Yes, this makes a lot of sense to me too. It was just that a well-known science writer expressed some doubts about it in a book review forum recently, which left me wondering in turn. Thanks for the input.
 
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
I would like to use a pentaprism with some amount of magnification. The pentaprism will be used to reflect a real image at 90 degrees angle but I also want the reflected image to appear larger. The distance between the prism and the real image is about 70cm. The pentaprism has two reflecting sides (surfaces) with mirrored coating and two refracting sides. I understand that one of the four sides needs to be curved (spherical curvature) to achieve the magnification effect. But which of the...
Back
Top