B The Redness of Red: fact or fiction?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr Wu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fiction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether colors, specifically red, are objectively perceived or subjective constructs. While red light has a frequency of 650nm, this does not fully explain the experience of "redness" as perceived by humans. Neuroscientists argue that colors are merely phantom sensations created by the brain's processing of visual signals, rather than inherent properties of light. The brain interprets input from RGB sensors in the eyes, which can vary in sensitivity among individuals, including those with color deficiencies. Ultimately, the perception of color is a complex interplay between physical light properties and neurological processing.
Dr Wu
Messages
183
Reaction score
42
This question has been bothering me for sometime now: do we actually see colours? The colour red, for instance, has the frequency of 650nm, but does this explain its "redness" as experienced by humans? Many neuroscientists suggest this is just a phantom, that colours are subjective constructs, nothing more. What do physicists think?

And what about this?

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...lour-illusion-the-dress-blue-black-gold-white
 
Science news on Phys.org
Light has only the property of frequency and polarisation, there is physically nothing "red" about light. How our brain processes the incoming signals from our eyes is something totally different, these are neuro signals processed by the visual cortex.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Dr Wu and russ_watters
It looks as if the eye has RGB sensors and just compares the output of each. People with colour deficiency have differing sensitivities of these sensors, yet may describe what they see by colour names. No doubt the brain does not care what the actual sensitivities of the sensors are and just compares the three signals.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Dr Wu
Yes, this makes a lot of sense to me too. It was just that a well-known science writer expressed some doubts about it in a book review forum recently, which left me wondering in turn. Thanks for the input.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top