The Science Behind Your Eyes: How Rods & Cones Work

  • Thread starter Thread starter frost_zero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eyes Science Work
AI Thread Summary
Rods and cones are the two types of photoreceptors in the human eye that play crucial roles in vision. Rods are responsible for low-light vision and peripheral vision, while cones enable color perception and function best in bright light. The process involves phototransduction, where light is converted into electrical signals sent to the brain. There is interest in creating artificial versions of these photoreceptors for use in cameras. While individual photoreceptors can be connected to electrodes in laboratory settings, they are not expected to replace electronic sensors in cameras due to practical limitations. Understanding the biology behind these cells is essential for grasping their function and potential applications.
frost_zero
Messages
15
Reaction score
16
How do the rods and cones in your eyes work? I looked it up but didn't find any detailed explanation, and could we make them artificially to use like cameras?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
frost_zero said:
How do the rods and cones in your eyes work? I looked it up but didn't find any detailed explanation
How about this: wikipedia.
(You may find you need some basic understanding of biology for this.)

frost_zero said:
could we make them artificially to use like cameras?
Individual photoreceptors can be hooked up to electrodes, in labs, in small numbers, but they are not likely to replace electronic sensors in cameras.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top