I The second uniqueness theorem in electrostatics

AI Thread Summary
The second uniqueness theorem in electrostatics asserts that the electric field is uniquely determined when the total charge on each conductor and the charge distribution in the regions between conductors are known. However, the discussion highlights confusion regarding its practical application, particularly in identifying the true electric field among multiple candidates. While the theorem guarantees the uniqueness of the electric field, it does not provide a method for determining which specific electric field is the true one without knowing the exact charge distributions on the conductors. Participants express the need for clarity on the conditions required to ascertain the true electric field. Ultimately, understanding the charge distribution is essential to fully utilize the theorem and determine the unique electric field.
Ahmed1029
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
Does the second uniqueness theorem just say that if there is an electric field that satisfies Gauss's law for a surface surrounding each conductor + a surface enclosing all the conductors, it is indeed the true electric field, and no other electric field will satisfy those conditions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the link below, the second uniqueness theorem is described as follows.

"The second uniqueness theorem states that the electric field is uniquely determined if the total charge on each conductor is given and the charge distribution in the regions between the conductors is known"

http://teacher.pas.rochester.edu/PHY217/LectureNotes/Chapter3/LectureNotesChapter3.html

I think this conclusion clearly makes sense even without a rigorous mathematical proof.
 
Last edited:
alan123hk said:
"The second uniqueness theorem states that the electric field is uniquely determined if the total charge on each conductor is given and the charge distribution in the regions between the conductors is known"
I know, but I don't know how to use it when stated like this.
Is what I described above the right way to use it?
 
I think it's a little different from what you said.

In the figure below, the respective total charges q1, q2, and q3 of conductors s1, s2, and s3 are known, but the charge distribution on each conductor (S1, S2 and S3) is unknown.

Furthermore, the exact charge distribution in all other spaces S0 containing these three conductors is also known.

A06.jpg
 
alan123hk said:
I think it's a little different from what you said.

In the figure below, the respective total charges q1, q2, and q3 of conductors s1, s2, and s3 are known, but the charge distribution on each conductor (S1, S2 and S3) is unknown.

Furthermore, the exact charge distribution in all other spaces S0 containing these three conductors is also known.

that doesn't tell me how to use it or what conditions the electric field must satisfy to be true. All it says is that there is one electric field that is true, it doesn't tell me how to know which one is true. For example I give you 5 different electric fields and ask you which one is the true one, what will you do? What conditions are you going to apply ?
 
My understanding is that the uniqueness theorem only tells us that the electric field is unique and there cannot be another different electric field. So it can't tell us which electric field is true.

If we want to know what this unique electric field looks like, we must know the exact distribution of charges on conductors s1,s2 and s3.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Ahmed1029
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top