- #106
zomgwtf
- 66
- 2
jreelawg said:The Sudarium of Oviedo is a cloth that supposedly covered Jesus's face. It has blood stains which precisely match the blood stains of the shroud. Supposedly a forensic analysis has proven that the two covered the same person. The Sudarium of Oviedo has supposedly been in spain since 631 AD giving doubt to the carbon dating of the shroud.
I don't know where to get a good source for this. I saw it on a history channel documentary. You could tell beyond a doubt that the shroud, and the sudarium were either from the same body, or the shroud was created to match the sudarium, because it's a perfect match.
I'm pretty sure that the Sudarium was 'talked about' back in the late 6th century, that was when it was first ever brought up in history. Radiocarbon dating confirms that this article came from around the 7th century! So basically when it was talked about is the furthest date scientists can trace it back to! That's really odd, so in my opinion, it doesn't add any 'doubt' to the carbon dating of the shroud. It adds more doubt to the stories told about these artices, and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, both which have none. The only evidence they have is peoples belief that they are genuine.
Even if they WERE genuine all they do is show that a man existed when Christ was alive and was crucified and covered in clothes. Now I guess you could jump to the conclusion from here that this man must be the person who was written about in the bible but it hardly says anything about the validity of the religious beliefs in the bible.
So, in my opinion, articles like this are just useless artifacts that people tend to cling on to in order to substantiate their beliefs in various mystics. I'm an atheist and I can honestly say: If there was 100% conclusive evidence that a man Jesus Christ did live and people wrote about him in the Bible I would still be an atheist.