The speed of light and the uncertainty principle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, specifically the relation h-bar/2 <= dE * dt, and its implications for the speed of light. It clarifies that low energy radio waves do not imply a significant probability of photons traveling faster than light, as the energy of light is dependent on frequency rather than velocity. The conversation also references a more nuanced formulation of the uncertainty principle, highlighting the relationship between time and energy through the expression ΔA/|d⟨A⟩/dt|ΔE ≥ ℏ/2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics terminology
  • Basic knowledge of photon energy and frequency relationship
  • Concept of operators in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between energy and frequency in electromagnetic waves
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of quantum operators
  • Investigate discussions on the speed of light in various physical theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of modern physics will benefit from this discussion.

JoAuSc
Messages
197
Reaction score
1
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle says that

h-bar/2 <= dE * dt.

Let's say we have this device that emitted very low energy radio waves. Does that mean there'd be a significant probability of these photons traveling faster than light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JoAuSc said:
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle says that

h-bar/2 <= dE * dt.

It's more subtle than that. We can show from general principles that

[tex]\frac{\Delta A}{|d\langle A\rangle/dt|}\Delta E \ge \hbar/2[/tex]

If we now define the bit on the left as [itex]\Delta t,[/itex] we get the oft-quoted uncertainty relation between time and energy.

The justification for making that identification is that it's the average time taken for the expectation of the operator A to change by its standard deviation, so it's roughly the time scale to measure a change in A.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K