The spin-flavor wavefunction of Sigma+

  • I
  • Thread starter Xico Sim
  • Start date
  • #1
43
3
Hi, guys.

If I want to write the spin-flavor wavefunction of ##\Sigma_+## starting only from knowing that the quark content of the proton is ##uud##, how can I procced?
I started by applying the ladder operators in order to get the baryon octet vertexes. I am now having problems with:
  1. determining the flavor wavefunction for the center octet states (including ##\Sigma_+##).
  2. determining the spin wavefunction for ##\Sigma_+##. Even if I suppose that the its spin state is ##|1/2,1/2\rangle##, there is more than one way for this to happen when we combine 3 spin 1/2 quarks...
Does anyone know a text where I can find something like this done in a comprehensive and detailed way? Or, alternatively, can you tell me a way to do it?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
ChrisVer
Gold Member
3,373
459
Aren't sigma baryons strange ones? Are you using an SU(3) flavor symmetry?
As for the quarks they would be uus ? If you have more than 1 combination then you write them all, as you did for the proton [when you had the mixed symmetric states].
the flavor states can be obtained in a similar way by combining u,u and s.
 
  • #3
43
3
The problem is that I did not understand the derivation of the proton wavefunction also: I found Griffiths, and for that matter every other text I found on the subject, quite confusing. Do you happen to know a place where it is clearly and thoroughly explained?
 
  • #4
43
3
Using Thomson's book I understood the derivation of the proton spin-flavour wavefunction. I will try to apply what I learned to this case.
 
  • #5
ChrisVer
Gold Member
3,373
459
what is confusing?
 
  • #6
43
3
what is confusing?
To make myself clear, I posted my attempt. I arrived at the correct wavefunction, but I have a problem with it: even though it seems symmetric, I would expect it to be only mixed symmetric (only symmetric in 1,2), since ##X## is only symmetric in 1,2 and ##\phi## is completely symmetric...
 

Attachments

  • #7
ChrisVer
Gold Member
3,373
459
Why is phi symmetric? aren't you using a uds? I am sorry but I don't see why you wouldn't consider the antisymmetric singlet.
 
  • #8
43
3
I am sorry but I don't see why you wouldn't consider the antisymmetric singlet.
When determining ##X##?
 
  • #9
ChrisVer
Gold Member
3,373
459
when determining Phi...
you should have a symmetric one (in the triplet I=1 combination) : [itex] uds + dus[/itex]
and an antisymmetric one (in the singlet I=0 combination) : [itex] uds - dus [/itex]
they both correspond to I3=0
 
  • #10
Meir Achuz
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,529
114
Look at look at PR 172, 1807 for simple spin – flavor wave functions for baryons.
 
  • #11
43
3
Look at look at PR 172, 1807 for simple spin – flavor wave functions for baryons.
What is PR?
 

Related Threads on The spin-flavor wavefunction of Sigma+

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
807
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Top