- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
I am reading D. J. H. Garling's book: "A Course in Mathematical Analysis: Volume II: Metric and Topological Spaces, Functions of a Vector Variable" ... ...
I am focused on Chapter 11: Metric Spaces and Normed Spaces ... ...
I need some help with Corollary 11.1.5 ...
Corollary 11.1.5 reads as follows:
In the above proof by Garling we read the following:
" ... ... : using the inequality of the previous corollary,##d( z + w , 0 ) = \left( \sum_{ j = 1 }^d \mid z_j + w_j \mid^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } \le \left( \sum_{ j = 1}^d ( \mid z_j \mid + \mid w_j \mid )^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } ####\le \left( \sum_{ j = 1 }^d \mid z_j \mid^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } + \left( \sum_{ j = 1 }^d \mid w_j \mid^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} }= d(z,0) + d(w,0) ##
My questions are as follows:Question 1
Can someone please explain exactly why we have:## d( z + w , 0 ) = \left( \sum_{ j = 1 }^d \mid z_j + w_j \mid^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } \le \left( \sum_{ j = 1}^d ( \mid z_j \mid + \mid w_j \mid )^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } ##How/why does this hold true?
Question 2
Can someone please explain exactly why we have: ## \left( \sum_{ j = 1}^d ( \mid z_j \mid + \mid w_j \mid )^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } \le \left( \sum_{ j = 1 }^d \mid z_j \mid^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } + \left( \sum_{ j = 1 }^d \mid w_j \mid^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} }= d(z,0) + d(w,0) ##How/why does this hold true?
Help will be appreciated ...
Peter========================================================================================Relevant to the above post is Proposition 11.2.3 and Corollary 11.1.4 ... so I am providing both ... as follows:
Hope the above scanned text helps readers understand the post ...
Peter
I am focused on Chapter 11: Metric Spaces and Normed Spaces ... ...
I need some help with Corollary 11.1.5 ...
Corollary 11.1.5 reads as follows:
In the above proof by Garling we read the following:
" ... ... : using the inequality of the previous corollary,##d( z + w , 0 ) = \left( \sum_{ j = 1 }^d \mid z_j + w_j \mid^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } \le \left( \sum_{ j = 1}^d ( \mid z_j \mid + \mid w_j \mid )^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } ####\le \left( \sum_{ j = 1 }^d \mid z_j \mid^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } + \left( \sum_{ j = 1 }^d \mid w_j \mid^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} }= d(z,0) + d(w,0) ##
My questions are as follows:Question 1
Can someone please explain exactly why we have:## d( z + w , 0 ) = \left( \sum_{ j = 1 }^d \mid z_j + w_j \mid^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } \le \left( \sum_{ j = 1}^d ( \mid z_j \mid + \mid w_j \mid )^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } ##How/why does this hold true?
Question 2
Can someone please explain exactly why we have: ## \left( \sum_{ j = 1}^d ( \mid z_j \mid + \mid w_j \mid )^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } \le \left( \sum_{ j = 1 }^d \mid z_j \mid^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} } + \left( \sum_{ j = 1 }^d \mid w_j \mid^2 \right)^{ \frac{1}{2} }= d(z,0) + d(w,0) ##How/why does this hold true?
Help will be appreciated ...
Peter========================================================================================Relevant to the above post is Proposition 11.2.3 and Corollary 11.1.4 ... so I am providing both ... as follows:
Hope the above scanned text helps readers understand the post ...
Peter