The Strong Nuclear Force: Increasing with Distance?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the strong nuclear force, particularly its behavior with distance as described in the context of quarks and baryons. Participants explore the implications of a force that purportedly strengthens with distance and the resulting challenges in understanding the existence of free baryons.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the validity of the teacher's explanation regarding the strong nuclear force's behavior over distance. Some suggest that the force is short-range and becomes attractive at certain distances, while others explore analogies to clarify the concept.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the nature of the strong nuclear force, with some participants providing clarifications and analogies to aid understanding. Multiple interpretations of the force's behavior are being discussed, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of the strong nuclear force's characteristics as described by their teacher, particularly in relation to the existence of free baryons and the energy required to separate quarks.

Atomos
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
My (high school) physics teacher was telling us about quarks and how the colour force between quarks is responsible for the strong nuclear force among baryons. He also claimed that unlike other forces, this force became stronger over a distance which is why it requires a lot of energy to separate quarks. I do not understand how it is possible to have a force that becomes stronger as distance increases. If this is so, how is it possible to to have protons and neutrons not bound to the nucleus? Wouldnt it be impossible to ever supply enough energy to have free baryons? Did my teacher incorrectly describe the distribution of the strong nuclear force?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Realize that the strong nuclear force is a very short-range force. Outside of a certain distance (typical nucleon separation distances) the force quickly dies off.
 
Doc Al said:
Realize that the strong nuclear force is a very short-range force. Outside of a certain distance (typical nucleon separation distances) the force quickly dies off.

It becomes stronger over an increase in distance to a certain point then dies off? That would seem to make more sense.
 
That's right. At very close distances the force is highly repulsive. As distance increases, it becomes more and more attractive. After reaching a maximumum attractiveness, it begins to die off rapidly with greater distance.
 
Atomos said:
My (high school) physics teacher was telling us about quarks and how the colour force between quarks is responsible for the strong nuclear force among baryons. He also claimed that unlike other forces, this force became stronger over a distance which is why it requires a lot of energy to separate quarks. I do not understand how it is possible to have a force that becomes stronger as distance increases. If this is so, how is it possible to to have protons and neutrons not bound to the nucleus? Wouldnt it be impossible to ever supply enough energy to have free baryons? Did my teacher incorrectly describe the distribution of the strong nuclear force?

As Doc All explained, it increases over a hort distance range and then dies off quickly.

If you want to have a mental picture, think of a rubber band. Think of the quarks as being little beads attached at the ends of the rubber band. If they are very close, the force is very small. As you pull the beads apart, the force increases (pulling them back together). If you pull too much, the rubber band snaps and the force goes to zero. (the difference though is that in the case of quarks, when the equivalent of the rubber band snaps, the energy stored in the rubber band is converted into mass (thik of E=mc^2) and it creates two new quarks at the extremities of the rubber bands that snapped, ''repairing'' the rubber band there. So when the rubber bands snaps, you end up with *two* rubber bands each with two quarks attached (so for a total of 4 quarks). The end result is that the energy you put in in stretching the rubber band has been converted into mass of the new quarks. This is why also one never sees an isolated quark, a quark alone.

Hope this makes sense

Pâtrick
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K