- #1

- 28

- 0

Is it a little awkward to specify a basis in the proof? Are linear operators and matrices technically two different classes of objects that may be linked by some "matrix representation function" wrt a basis? Thanks!

- Thread starter 1230wc
- Start date

- #1

- 28

- 0

Is it a little awkward to specify a basis in the proof? Are linear operators and matrices technically two different classes of objects that may be linked by some "matrix representation function" wrt a basis? Thanks!

- #2

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,833

- 961

(The bases do not have to be orthonormal. You just have to have some inner product defined on the space to talk about self-adjoint.)

But to go the other way, you don't have to say "view matrix A as a linear transformation". An n by m matrix

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 8K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 808

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 9K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 4K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 84

- Views
- 7K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 17

- Views
- 5K

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 5K