The theoretical max. speed in deep space

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
Faux Carnival
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Isn't the theoretical max. speed in deep space unlimited? There is no friction. Therefore, any energy we add to the spacecraft will increase its speed. So can't the speed of light be reached?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Faux Carnival! :smile:
Faux Carnival said:
Isn't the theoretical max. speed in deep space unlimited? There is no friction. Therefore, any energy we add to the spacecraft will increase its speed. So can't the speed of light be reached?

(hmm … i thought pf had an faq on this, but i can't find it :confused:)

first, we add momentum, not energy (force times time = change in momentum) :wink:

second, yes we can keep adding momentum, and the speed will keep increasing :smile:, but it will never quite reach c :redface:

(momentum = mv/√(1 - v2/c2) -> ∞ as v -> c)
 
tiny-tim said:
Hello Faux Carnival! :smile:


(hmm … i thought pf had an faq on this, but i can't find it :confused:)

first, we add momentum, not energy (force times time = change in momentum) :wink:

second, yes we can keep adding momentum, and the speed will keep increasing :smile:, but it will never quite reach c :redface:

(momentum = mv/√(1 - v2/c2) -> ∞ as v -> c)


Thanks for your reply. I was thinking of kinetic energy. They seem to be the same thing anyway.

But my thinking is not flawed, right? In space, accelerating from 30,000 to 31,000 km/h is the same thing as accelerating from 50,000 to 51,000 km/h?
 
Faux Carnival said:
In space, accelerating from 30,000 to 31,000 km/h is the same thing as accelerating from 50,000 to 51,000 km/h?

Nope!

The latter involves slightly more change in momentum … mv/√(1 - v2/c2) … than the former.

And so the latter takes slightly more force (technically, impulse) than the former.

And the closer you get to the speed of light, the greater the difference! :smile: