The time expression of the matter-raditation equality era

  • Thread starter Thread starter Magister
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the time of matter-radiation equality using redshift, referencing the Friedmann equation. The user identifies the need to apply the radiation-dominated expression for time but notes that the Kolb and Turner book utilizes the matter-dominated expression. The user seeks clarification on this choice, suspecting it relates to calculating the age of the universe. The relevant equations and chapters from Kolb and Turner are specified, with the conclusion that the matter-dominated form is used due to its basis on the current Hubble rate (H0).

PREREQUISITES
  • Friedmann equation
  • Redshift calculations
  • Understanding of matter and radiation dominated eras
  • Knowledge of Hubble's Law (H0)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Friedmann equation in detail
  • Learn about the implications of redshift on cosmic time
  • Examine the derivation of the equations in Kolb and Turner, specifically chapters 3.2 and 3.5
  • Research the significance of Hubble's Law in cosmological models
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the dynamics of the early universe and the relationship between matter and radiation during cosmic evolution.

Magister
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement

I am asked to find the time of the matter-radiation equality.
I have already find the red shift of this era, so I just need to find the expression of time in terms of red shift.
From the Friedmann equation I can derive 2 relations between time and the red shift, one to the matter dominated era and another to the radiation dominated era.
I suppose that I will have to use the second one because from the beginning until the equality of the densities it was a radiation dominated universe.
My problem is that I saw, in the Kolb and Turner book, that they use the matter dominated expression. What am I missing??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would guess that they are then computing the time between now and the equality time. But that's basically the age of the universe. The more interesting number would be time from big bang to equality time. Do you have a chapter page reference from Kolb and Turner?
 
The t_{eq} is in page 89 (chapter 3.5) and the expression they use are in page 65 (chapter 3.2) (for \Omega_0 = 1).
I understand why do you say that they must be computing the age from the equality time until now but the they get a t_{eq}=2.4 X 10^3 years so it must be from the Big Bang until the equility time...
Thanks for your help!
 
Last edited:
Ok, my page numbers are a little different, but the equation they refer to (3.45) looks to be a more exact expression, valid for both matter and radiation dominated periods. I think the reason for the matter dominated form in the approximate solution is because it's based on H_0, the current Hubble rate. So to project back to get temperature etc at equality time, it's appropriate to use the matter dominated form.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
944
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K