- #561
El Hombre Invisible
- 692
- 0
And this gets back to all those posts I made about the list of 'evidence' the police cited as reasons to blow his brains out which, at the risk of getting dizzy, I will recapitulate:Daminc said:When I came up with alternative senarios it was because a few people here came out and stated there opinions as facts. I never said that my senarios were correct only that the alternative scenario was possible (based on what was know at the time).
1. he lived in the same block of flats as terrorist suspects (who, since then, have turned out NOT to be terrorists);
2. he was wearing a big coat (which he wasn't);
3. he looked Asian (which he didn't);
4. he ran onto the tube.
These were the known "facts", many of them fabricated, and none of them suggesting he was a suicide bomber. Your 'alternative scenarios' (or senarios as you consistently spel itt) did nothing to escape the blinding truth - there was no evidence to condemn de Menezes. You can hark on with ifs and maybes but it doesn't change the fact that there was no evidence. Notably, he was not carrying a bomb (even our government-baiting UK media would not run stories about innocent lives being lost if de Menezes had been carrying a bomb on the tube). This wasn't a grey area then and it's even more black and white now. When people said that this was an unjustified killing, they were not prejudging - based on the evidence upon which we were told de Menezes was killed he SHOULD NOT have been killed. Period. Had there been an additional claim that de Menezes was carrying something that may have concealed a bomb, you'd probably have seen less outrage on this thread. But that would have been too big a lie even for the police and home office, more comfortable with spin, to promote.
Besides, proposing alternative scenarios does not constitute 'awaiting the facts'. And your clear and repeated defense of the shoot-to-kill policy sounded like you were doing more than playing Devil's advocate.
Clearly I of all people am not condemning any shortage of patience on your part. I'm merely pointing out that, on yet another topic, you reproach others for your own sins.Daminc said:As for snide comments...maybe. I get exasperated when people seem to be bigoted and that also brings out the worst in me.
And so are we. But nothing new has contradicted out original position. The facts as they stood told us de Menezes was wrongly killed and told us that the British public were being misinformed. The only questions now are: "who exactly is to blame" and "to what extent have we been lied to".Daminc said:I have waited for the facts...I'm still waiting for the rest of them.
To the extent that you did not await the facts before forging your opinion that under the circumstances the police behaved appropriately. Note, again, I'm not dissing you for coming to this opinion (well, not in this paragraph), merely for telling us we prematurely came to the opposite view, the view that actually stood the test of time.Daminc said:In what manner did I not apply it to myself?