The Unruh Effect and Expansion of the Universe

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JPBenowitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the relationship between the Unruh Effect, which describes how uniformly accelerating observers perceive an effective temperature, and the expansion of the universe. Participants question whether all observers in inertial reference frames would observe this temperature and consider implications for black hole microstates and the information paradox.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if the Unruh Effect's temperature exists, it should be uniformly observable across all inertial reference frames due to the Cosmological Principle.
  • Others argue that the expansion of space does not resemble the acceleration considered in the Unruh Effect, raising questions about how distance affects observed temperature.
  • One participant asserts that Unruh radiation is specific to accelerating observers, suggesting that inertial observers in an expanding universe would not experience this temperature.
  • There is a recurring question about whether the observed temperature could relate to missing microstates in black holes, contributing to the information paradox.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether all observers would perceive the temperature predicted by the Unruh Effect, indicating unresolved disagreement on this topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the dependence of observed temperature on distance and the specific conditions required for the Unruh Effect to manifest.

JPBenowitz
Messages
144
Reaction score
2
The Unruh Effect predicts that a uniformly accelerating observer in a vacuum field (full of perturbations) will observe an effective temperature. We know that space is expanding at an accelerating rate. My question is then, in all inertial reference frames would all 'observers' in the universe hypothetically observe this temperature? Could the observation of this temperature be the missing microstates from within black holes which leads to the information paradox?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JPBenowitz said:
The Unruh Effect predicts that a uniformly accelerating observer in a vacuum field (full of perturbations) will observe an effective temperature. We know that space is expanding at an accelerating rate. My question is then, in all inertial reference frames would all 'observers' in the universe hypothetically observe this temperature?

Given the Cosmological Principle, I'd say yes. If such a thing exists, it should be the same everywhere (away from massive bodies)

Could the observation of this temperature be the missing microstates from within black holes which leads to the information paradox?

HUH ?
 
I would be surprised if the expansion of space (accelerated or not) resembles the acceleration considered for the Unruh effect.
Here is a tricky question: the acceleration (expressed in m/s^2) depends on the distance, but or local observed temperature cannot depend on that. Which distance would we have to choose?
Could the observation of this temperature be the missing microstates from within black holes which leads to the information paradox?
?
 
JPBenowitz said:
The Unruh Effect predicts that a uniformly accelerating observer in a vacuum field (full of perturbations) will observe an effective temperature. We know that space is expanding at an accelerating rate. My question is then, in all inertial reference frames would all 'observers' in the universe hypothetically observe this temperature?
No. Unruh radiation is observed by an accelerating observer. An observer in an inertial reference frame (even in an expanding universe) is not an accelerating observer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K