The word "won't" does not look logically formed

  • Thread starter Thread starter symbolipoint
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the contraction "won't," which is derived from "will not," yet its spelling does not follow a logical pattern, leading to curiosity about its origins. Participants speculate that its pronunciation influenced the spelling, with some suggesting it may have roots in Old English or adaptations by playwrights like Shakespeare. The conversation touches on the evolution of English contractions and the complexities of the language's spelling conventions. Additionally, there are references to other contractions and linguistic quirks, highlighting the irregularities and borrowing in English. Overall, the thread explores the historical and linguistic factors that contribute to the formation of "won't."
  • #31
phinds said:
It ain't. Get over it.
Where did ain't come from.
Used to mean "are not", but now you get the ruler for using it.
Well , maybe not now, but at one time, when teachers had the powre pohwa.

EDIT: changed power to a Boston accent.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes Klystron
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
256bits said:
Where did ain't come from.
Used to mean "are not", but now you get the ruler for using it.
Well , maybe not now, but at one time, when teachers had the powre.
The Wikipedia Ain't article covers this well enough -- It contains a reference to 'rhoticity' -- 'whether' or 'whethə' the 'r' is pronounced or not, when it immediately follows, but does not immediately precede, another vowel -- fascinating fodder for amateur philologists.
 
  • Like
Likes 256bits
  • #33
256bits said:
Used to mean "are not", but now you get the ruler for using it.
Originally "ain't" was a contraction of "am not" per the Wiki article that @sysprog referred to. More recently it has become a contraction for am not, is not, and are not.

As a side note, I was watching an Irish series called "Blood" and one character said "I amn't," something I'd never heard before.
 
  • Like
Likes 256bits
  • #34
Syntactic quirks from the language that brought you sentences like
'James, while John had had "had", had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher'
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Haha
Likes MathematicalPhysicist
  • #36
DaveC426913 said:
Heh. I like that. I'm going to start writing all my correspondence using British/Canadian spellings for lable, decible, reble and lible.
Once, while working in the U.S., I comment to a colleague that for some words, Canadians commonly use British spelling, while for other words, Canadians commonly use American spelling. Former, "colour"; latter, "tire". My colleague then asked "Do Canadians spell 'civilization' with an ess or a zee?" I replied "Canadians spell 'civilization' with a zed."
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes MathematicalPhysicist, DrClaude, Klystron and 1 other person
  • #37
Vanadium 50 said:
There's a story told about a sign painter who was hired to paint a sign for the front of a bakery. The sign was to read "Pies and Cakes."
After working on the layout awhile, the painter asked the baker, "How much space should I leave between Pies and and and and and Cakes?"
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
  • #38
I hope the baker gave the answer in pie-cas.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and sysprog
  • #39
Very interesting. I had wondered about this too. Just figured it was something we borrowed but really had no idea other than that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K