The World's First Petaflop SuperComputer

  • Thread starter Thread starter neutrino
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
31 replies · 5K views
neutrino
Messages
2,093
Reaction score
2
The honours go to Japan in creating it. Although it is not officially the world's fastest supercomputer, it may well be when the list of the fastest 500 comes out next time.

http://www.newsfactor.com/news/Japa...uter-Stakes/story.xhtml?story_id=1220059R0ADY

EDIT: This should be probably be in the Technology section, so feel free to shift it there if any of the mentors feel so.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) And I THOUGHT I was saving the whales.
2) We can now find the largest Prime number.
3) 3.14159? (come on, you KNEW it was coming.)

4)1st post...what fun.
 
LowlyPion said:
Which one is it?
Is there one Largest Prime? Wouldn't we have to construct a computer more complex than the Universe to even stand a chance of locating that? :confused:
 
neutrino said:
The honours go to Japan in creating it. Although it is not officially the world's fastest supercomputer, it may well be when the list of the fastest 500 comes out next time.

http://www.newsfactor.com/news/Japa...uter-Stakes/story.xhtml?story_id=1220059R0ADY

EDIT: This should be probably be in the Technology section, so feel free to shift it there if any of the mentors feel so.

The link you supplied didn't work well. Wiki supplies a value of 4.1 PFLOPS as some sort of current record.
 
Phrak said:
The link you supplied didn't work well. Wiki supplies a value of 4.1 PFLOPS as some sort of current record.

You have noticed that you comment on over two years old post, didn't you?
 
Does this mean they can send one quadrillion credit card applications to my goldfish every second now?
 
I don't know, twas a joke.(prime nimber)
And yea, I knew it was a two year old, so what. IBM just announed new Petaflop comp, caught my interest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ivan Seeking said:
Mathematicians found that last week under a '56 Buick parked between 2nd and Main.


Great humour!
 
jimmysnyder said:
Does this mean they can send one quadrillion credit card applications to my goldfish every second now?


Doesn't sparky, your trusted pet dog,sand perhaps yout cat too get "pre-approved" apps. in the mail?
 
Is it a desktop or a laptop?
 
turbo-1 said:
Is there one Largest Prime? Wouldn't we have to construct a computer more complex than the Universe to even stand a chance of locating that? :confused:

No they can just estimate it and round to the nearest hundred thousand.
 
I'm not sure I want a faster computer. Much faster and it would crash faster than it boots.

The size scales are interesting. Light travels .008 inches in a pico second. (1 pico = 1/tera). What are the feature sizes of transistors in todays supercomputers?
 
I remember when a teraflop was the big thing. One Teraflop is a trillion floating-point operations per second, so a petaflop would be a thousand trillion.

Here is the latest, or was. Only costs $133 million.

An American military supercomputer, assembled from components originally designed for video game machines, has reached a long-sought-after computing milestone by processing more than 1.026 quadrillion calculations per second.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/09/technology/09petaflops.html
 
Phrak said:
I'm not sure I want a faster computer. Much faster and it would crash faster than it boots.

Consider a non-Microsoft Operating system then.
 
Evo said:
I remember when a teraflop was the big thing. One Teraflop is a trillion floating-point operations per second, so a petaflop would be a thousand trillion.

My first IBM PC was 16kb memory and ran at about 5 mhz. I had to shell out $2000 for it. I added extra chips myself to get it up to 64kb to save a few hundred bucks. That was k in kilo-bytes - not a typo.

Moore's Law has been running riot ever sense.
 
Evo said:
I remember when a teraflop was the big thing. One Teraflop is a trillion floating-point operations per second, so a petaflop would be a thousand trillion.

I wonder if the indentured servitude of twentyfive 24/7 technicians and engineers are included in the price, or are they extra?

This computer appears to be running 13,000 floating point operations in parallel, or perhaps some multiple of it. This is a computer involving several racks of floating point processors spread out over a computer room.

In (1/tera) seconds, 10^-15 sec, light in vacuum travels 8 microns.

The current smallest process feature size of a semiconductor about 0.09 microns, spacing adjacent FET transistors about 0.9 microns from center to center (my best guess).

The Pentium 4's feature size is currently at 0.13 microns.

http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/cpu/moore.ars/2"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Redbelly98 said:
It would be better to find the largest integer first.

When I was younger there were no integers larger than 65535. It has changed since then.
 
Last edited:
Redbelly98 said:
It would be better to find the largest integer first. Then we'd have an upper bound on the largest prime, greatly simplifying the task.
First look for the largest even integer. Then you'll have an upper bound for the largest even prime.
 
jimmysnyder said:
First look for the largest even integer. Then you'll have an upper bound for the largest even prime.

So it isn't 42...
 
The largest prime is a function of time. Setting the current time to [tex]t_0[/tex], we get [tex]\epsilon(t_0) = 2^{43112609} - 1[/tex], where [tex]\epsilon > 0[/tex] is the largest prime. Now apply A. Einstein's speed limit of 300 km/s to get a upper limit for the current time (which is no longer what the current time was when I began this post), in terms of the current space. We find that for each [tex]\epsilon[/tex], there is a [tex]\delta > 0[/tex] such that [tex]|f(x) - f(y)| < \epsilon[/tex]. (See Introduction to Elementary Quantum Field Theory for Poets, by Gumm, page 486257). Now we use the standard mathematician's subterfuge of allowing zero to approach [tex]\delta[/tex] from behind. This sneak attack will insure that [tex]\delta[/tex] is circumspect while we let [tex]\epsilon \rightarrow 0[/tex]. Thus the largest prime is zero.
 
Evo said:
I remember when a teraflop was the big thing. One Teraflop is a trillion floating-point operations per second, so a petaflop would be a thousand trillion./QUOTE]

Or roughly the eqiv. of 250000 calcs per second per living person on this planet.
 
Phrak said:
The size scales are interesting. Light travels .008 inches in a pico second. (1 pico = 1/tera). What are the feature sizes of transistors in todays supercomputers?
The switching time is more a question of the capacitance of the junction which fortunately drops with feature size. Even desktop PCs now have <45nm features.

Your point is a big problem in network switches.
A 100Gb network switch means the light only goes a couple of mm as each new bit arrives.
You have to read the packet header and decide where to route the signal in the time it takes light to cross the PCB