The World's Largest Computer in 1951

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computer
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2,468 replies · 236K views
"Revolutionised Chemistry" is a pun of some sort.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The compound microscope, Zacharias Janssen, ~1590??
 
dextercioby said:
it was not a revolution. in the sense putting a *************** in a chemistry lab was.:wink:


Bench? Sink? Blackboard? Fume cupboard? Fridge? Door? :smile:
 
Yeah, I figured- but the question does seem very broad. Was is some kind of thermometer?? -No one is stealing this from me either! :devil:
 
It's going to turn out to be something like Cavendish being the first person to bring a round stool into the lab or something along those lines.
 
I think it was invented by that time,but nope,at that time,putting it in a lab was not crucial.

"Revolutionized chemistry=It literally changed the way chemistry was (being) done".

Daniel.
 
zoobyshoe said:
It's going to turn out to be something like Cavendish being the first person to bring a round stool into the lab or something along those lines.

It's really essential.You won't believe that simple it is. :wink:

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
It's really essential.You won't believe that simple it is. :wink:

Daniel.
Artificial illumination? Say, an oil lamp?
 
Evo's not original (check out the previous page with Ivan's answer).Nope,it's not a lighting tool.

Daniel.

EDIT:You're not original with the centrifuge,either. :-p
 
Last edited:
dextercioby said:
Evo's not original (check out the previous page with Ivan's answer).Nope,it's not a lighting tool.

Daniel.
sorry, I hadn't read all posts, not even the quetion. :redface: I changed it.
 
First chemistry textbook, Andreas Libavius, 1597??
Vacuum pump, Otto von Guericke, 1645??

Eh, the pre-dating electrolysis was a hint, right?
 
Last edited:
Nope to test tube,Bunsen burner,well,it's the 3-rd time i see that answer,but Bunsen was born and worked in the XVIII-th century.

Daniel.
 
Interesting,but nope,vacuum pump is in a plasma physics lab.Chemists would be dead without a ***************** in their lab.

Daniel.
 
A ventilation system?!?
 
Evo said:
acidimeter?

At that time,they didn't know what acid was.

Please,guess it.If you don't,u'll see that those answers were/are unbelievebly complicated and u'll get a bit of frustration,too.

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Need i say that this is not a technical question,so it can be answered by virtually anyone...?
It is an object/instrument, but not a technical one.

Chamber pot?
 
dextercioby said:
At that time,they didn't know what acid was.

Please,guess it.If you don't,u'll see that those answers were/are unbelievebly complicated and u'll get a bit of frustration,too.

Daniel.
Did you ever state the century? Or will that give it away?
 
Evo said:
Did you ever state the century? Or will that give it away?

I'm asking for the object,which should be the easy part,then the guy who did it and the year (with approximation) in which it happened.

The century will be given as a clue,if you can't find the name and the year.

But first,the easy part.

No,to Brewnog's jokes.

Daniel.
 
brewnog said:
Coffee machine?
Heh, that would be math ;)

Okay some guesses: protective clothing (including glasses), storage device, a book, type of camera, uhhh... fire predates chemistry, so I guess that wouldn't have really revolutionized it?
 
They hadn't discovered corrosive substances,nor dangerous gases which might blow up.Daguerre was not born.:wink: And Gutenberg had already died.

Daniel.
 
The match?

Robert Boyle (1680), John Walker (1827) or Charles Sauria (1830) are possible answers to that one.
 
Fire extinguisher!