The World's Largest Computer in 1951

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around historical and technical aspects of significant machines and vehicles, including the ENIAC computer and the Russian Ekranoplan. Participants engage in a quiz-like format, posing questions and providing hints about various inventions, their specifications, and historical context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the ENIAC, detailing its size, weight, components, and power consumption, while noting its limited processing power compared to modern devices.
  • Another participant identifies the ENIAC as the machine described in the previous post.
  • Participants discuss a large vehicle that weighs 540 tons, can travel over land and water, and is hinted to be built in Russia, leading to speculation about its identity.
  • Some participants propose that the vehicle in question is the Russian Ekranoplan, explaining its design and operational principles related to ground effect.
  • There is a discussion about a vehicle that achieved over 188 miles per gallon, with participants speculating on its type and historical significance, including a mention of a Harley Davidson motorcycle from 1908.
  • One participant describes a crude device involving a wooden stand, a funnel, acid, and copper wire, prompting further questions about its purpose.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the identity of some machines, particularly the vehicle that achieved high fuel efficiency, as various guesses and clarifications are made. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of some inventions and their historical context.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the specifications and classifications of the vehicles discussed, particularly regarding the Ekranoplan's operational capabilities and the fuel efficiency claims of the motorcycle.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in the history of computing, engineering innovations, and the evolution of vehicle technology may find this discussion engaging.

  • #1,921
honestrosewater said:
Spot on.

Yeah, what I don't understand is, well, have you ever seen a dog's bollocks? :confused:


:smile: :smile: Every day, benji loves to lay on the sofa, with legs splayed
apart.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #1,922
Texas, famous for horses, music?
 
  • #1,923
This was a very expensive ring.
 
  • #1,924
Texas has gambling, so a massive win that broke the bank?
 
  • #1,925
The new super-collider that Congress yanked the funding on?
 
  • #1,926
Sorry, had computer problems yesterday.
Danger said:
The new super-collider that Congress yanked the funding on?
Bingo. The Superconducting Super Collider. A ring particle accelerator, to be built in Texas, Congress was the big C, ~$8.25 billion is very expensive in my book. :biggrin:
 
  • #1,927
Danger said:
The new super-collider that Congress yanked the funding on?

Im beginning to think your quite bright, anyhows, jolly good show old boy.
 
  • #1,928
wolram said:
Im beginning to think your quite bright
Not really. I just remember hearing about it on the news or in SciAm or somewhere a few months ago.

An accessory for it was patented 45 years before the thing itself, by someone else. The thing itself was never built to the original specs, so far as can be determined. Several subsquent patents by other people were unsuccessful designs.

edit: I'm going for a well-needed nap now. Feel free to post parallel puzzles while I'm gone.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,929
Recoil mechanism on a rifle. Patented in 1899 by Paul Mauser, the M1 Garrand rifle wasn't actually made for another 45 years.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,930
brewnog said:
Recoil mechanism on a rifle.
Interesting info, of which I was unaware, but not what I'm thinking of. (I'll have to look into that, though.)

Original was hand-cranked.
 
  • #1,931
Ahh, then it's the starter motor for a car. This one's been done before though, so (assuming it's the right answer!) I won't take credit.



Edit: Actually, I think I'm wrong, the gap wasn't nearly 50 years. But I'll leave it there just in case!

For you to look into my last guess, click http://patentpending.blogs.com/patent_pending_blog/firearms_patentstechnology/ and search for "Mauser".
 
Last edited:
  • #1,932
brewnog said:
so (assuming it's the right answer!) I won't take credit.
You assume too quickly, m'man. Back it up a hundred years or so.
 
  • #1,933
Does this have something to do with communication? I'm thinking the phonograph was originally hand-cranked...
 
  • #1,934
honestrosewater said:
Does this have something to do with communication?
Nope....
 
  • #1,935
An accessory for it was patented 45 years before the thing itself, by someone else. The thing itself was never built to the original specs, so far as can be determined. Several subsquent patents by other people were unsuccessful designs.

A vacuum cleaner?
 
  • #1,936
wolram said:
A vacuum cleaner?
Sorry... no. But you're starting to get closer. Continue on the domestic theme.
Thanks for the link, Noggie. I'll go read it right now.
 
  • #1,937
I think he's referring to the sewing machine.
 
  • #1,938
zoobyshoe said:
I think he's referring to the sewing machine.
I think he thinks correctly. A sewing machine needle was patented in 1755, but there was no machine to go with it. (Just realized that I screwed up the time span.) A machine was patented in 1790, but not built. The first working model was made, but not patented, in 1810. Weird.
 
  • #1,939
Danger said:
I think he thinks correctly. A sewing machine needle was patented in 1755, but there was no machine to go with it. (Just realized that I screwed up the time span.) A machine was patented in 1790, but not built. The first working model was made, but not patented, in 1810. Weird.

Screwed up the time span eh, not another ground hog day.
 
  • #1,940
its about 8482 square km, and its a wet cell.
 
  • #1,941
Oooh I like the sound of this!

Is it Lake Volta? If so, I admire your punnage. :smile:
 
  • #1,942
brewnog said:
Oooh I like the sound of this!

Is it Lake Volta? If so, I admire your punnage. :smile:

INcredible FAnblooming Tastic.
 
  • #1,943
Well that was such a good pun, and I feel so guilty for getting it straight away that I want you to do another one. Your go again!
 
  • #1,944
Since Wolram took off for the moment... An interesting pic from my files. It may be obvious, but if not, or even if so, I thought it worth a go around. What was it?

http://img106.echo.cx/img106/51/whatwasit4pz.jpg
 
  • #1,945
Is that a CAT or MRI scanner[/color]?
 
  • #1,946
Very good! You are on the right track.
 
  • #1,947
There is a story behind the picture posted. Your challenge, should you choose to accept it, is to give a reasonable approximation of that story.
 
  • #1,948
Ivan Seeking said:
There is a story behind the picture posted. Your challenge, should you choose to accept it, is to give a reasonable approximation of that story.
Is this the portable MRI unit for which you engineered a self-leveling system?
 
  • #1,949
zoobyshoe said:
Is this the portable MRI unit for which you engineered a self-leveling system?

No :smile:

Now wait, did I tell you about the leveling system, or was that a fortuitous joke?
 
  • #1,950
I'm afraid I don't know very many MRI related anecdotes, except for the poor chap who was last week scanned under the influence of a muscle relaxant, while they played Dido to him!

Being paralysed, strapped down, and forced to listen to Dido doesn't sound like fun.
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K