The World's Largest Computer in 1951

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computer
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around two significant machines: the ENIAC, an early computer that was 10 feet tall, weighed 30 tons, and required 150 kilowatts of power, and the Russian Ekranoplan, a ground effect vehicle that could travel over 400 km/h and weighed 540 tons. The ENIAC utilized a vast number of electronic components but had less processing power than a modern pocket calculator. The Ekranoplan, developed by the Soviet Union, operates just above water using a shock wave principle, allowing it to travel over various terrains. The conversation also touches on trivia and historical facts about these machines, highlighting their unique engineering and capabilities. Overall, the thread showcases a blend of technical details and engaging quiz-like interactions.
  • #2,101
I wonder how they keep it on.[/size]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2,102
honestrosewater said:
I wonder how they keep it on.[/size]

Fish glue, i think.
 
  • #2,103
Another quickie.

What connects, 1968 organ, 1986 motorhead.
 
  • #2,104
Bye, bye thread :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:
 
  • #2,105
I'm still here. Does it have something to do with pipes?
 
  • #2,106
Ooh, 1973 Sleeper?
 
  • #2,107
honestrosewater said:
Ooh, 1973 Sleeper?

A certain lady was just satisfied :smile:
 
  • #2,108
Or was she ?
 
  • #2,109
or was shee?
 
  • #2,110
Mk said:
or was shee?

there was an
o:) Mk, HRWwb is getting slow :biggrin:
 
  • #2,111
Who's slow?

In accounting, this is the standard way of recording transactions.
 
  • #2,112
honestrosewater said:
Who's slow?

In accounting, this is the standard way of recording transactions.
 
  • #2,113
Did you get it??
 
  • #2,114
By Rose, In accounting, this is the standard way of recording transactions.

:confused: Ahh, i missed this post Your looking for some thing
:!) sexy.
 
  • #2,115
So did anyone get it? I think it's pretty easy.
 
  • #2,116
honestrosewater said:
So did anyone get it? I think it's pretty easy.
I built one a few years back, it is still un tested. :smile:
 
  • #2,117
:smile: Ahhh... I'm so lost. Was 1973 Sleeper wrong? Your clue was the Orgasmatron, right?
 
  • #2,118
honestrosewater said:
:smile: Ahhh... I'm so lost. Was 1973 Sleeper wrong? Your clue was the Orgasmatron, right?

Just pulling your plonker Rose, you are correct :biggrin: next one please.
 
  • #2,119
wolram said:
Just pulling your plonker Rose, you are correct :biggrin: next one please.
Okay, did you get this one:
In accounting, this is the standard way of recording transactions.
 
  • #2,120
honestrosewater said:
Okay, did you get this one:
In accounting, this is the standard way of recording transactions.

double entry...?
 
Last edited:
  • #2,121
No, thank you. I'm not into that kind of thing. :blushing:

Oh... yes, that's the answer. :biggrin:
 
  • #2,122
honestrosewater said:
No, thank you. I'm not into that kind of thing. :blushing:

:bugeye:...is your mind always in the gutter?

Oh... yes, that's the answer. :biggrin:

oh...didn't expect that. Seemed too easy for it to be right. Does this mean I get to post one or has this just become a free for all? And I don't mean a free for all in the way you might be thinking either... :bugeye:
 
  • #2,123
you have to post one
 
  • #2,124
yomamma said:
you have to post one

Oh..geez...guess that will teach me to answer questions...

This will probably be way too easy for the people here...

What do MIT, princeton and electro-shock therapy have in common?
 
  • #2,125
Townsend said:
What do MIT, princeton and electro-shock therapy have in common?
Is it dirty? :devil: Bah, I'm too tired. John Nash?
 
  • #2,126
honestrosewater said:
Is it dirty? :devil:
:bugeye:

You need to find a partner...

Bah, I'm too tired. John Nash?

Yes...I would say it was too easy but I wouldn't want you to feel like I was putting down your intelligence...

So, how about I say...that was too easy for someone soo smart :smile:
 
  • #2,127
Townsend said:
Yes...I would say it was too easy but I wouldn't want you to feel like I was putting down your intelligence...

So, how about I say...that was too easy for someone soo smart :smile:
Yes, I know you're easy, but who's putting what where? :eek:

You can go again. I don't like thinking of clues. Make it hard this time. :wink:
 
  • #2,128
Sorry, I don't want to scare you away. I'll be good. o:)
 
  • #2,129
honestrosewater said:
Yes, I know you're easy, but who's putting what where? :eek:

You can go again. I don't like thinking of clues. Make it hard this time. :wink:

oh geez...(I will pretend to ignore the make it hard comment)

Umm...ok...

What does an apple, a mollusks, a rose, and Frank Lloyd Wright have in common?

If you get this one easy then you are a genius...
 
  • #2,130
Pearl (and Perl)?
 

Similar threads

Is Alan Turing given too much credit when it comes to computers?
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
How to compute flexure and failure loads of acrylic sheets
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K