Theoretical Astrophysics - Still a route to go?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the career prospects for those pursuing a PhD in theoretical physics, particularly in light of reports about physicists transitioning to other fields such as finance. Participants explore the motivations behind pursuing a PhD, the value of the knowledge gained, and the potential for job satisfaction outside of academia.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern about the job market for theoretical physicists and question the value of investing years into a PhD if it may not lead to a relevant academic position.
  • Others argue that passion for the subject, similar to pursuing a career in the arts, can justify the pursuit of a PhD despite uncertain job prospects.
  • A participant suggests that the skills acquired during a PhD may be transferable to other industries, potentially providing a safety net for those who do not secure academic positions.
  • Several participants propose a reflective question about whether one would still find value in the knowledge gained from a PhD if it did not lead to a desired job, indicating that personal fulfillment may be a significant factor in the decision to pursue advanced studies.
  • There is a sentiment that the process of learning and research itself can be rewarding, regardless of the eventual career outcome.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether pursuing a PhD in theoretical physics is advisable, with some advocating for the pursuit based on passion and personal fulfillment, while others express skepticism about the practicality of such a path given current job market conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge uncertainty regarding future job prospects in academia and the evolving nature of career paths for physicists, which may influence their views on the value of a PhD.

kennethkhoo
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I've been reading tons of story on theoretical physicist not having a job, and end up going to other fields such as finance etc. While we do still earn a living, the situation is pretty hard: why bother to spend ~7 years for a phd to end up in somewhere else? I mean there're better degrees to take - like Masters in Financial engineering. Hence my question:

For those who got a phd in theoretical physics and currently working (inside/outside academia), will you still recommend an enthusiast student to pursue their career in theoretical physics? Why/Why not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
People still try to join the music industry even though there isn't a great chance it will work and they do so because they love it enough to try.
 
jesse73 said:
People still try to join the music industry even though there isn't a great chance it will work and they do so because they love it enough to try.

This is why I do it.

Hopefully, one acquires some skills along the way that are transferable to regular or semi-technical day jobs in case one doesn't have any other choice (math, electronics/optics, eloquent writing and basic programming).

IMO, it is still a lot safer than becoming a virtuoso musician, what can they do with their skills other than be instructors if they fail to secure record/tour deals?
 
I can't claim the wisdom of years quite yet, and I'm not sure just how hard it is to get an academic job, or will be in the future, but I think there's an easy litmus test:

If you couldn't get a job as a professor or researcher, would you still be happy to invest all that time and learn all those things? If you ended up in another industry, would you still be glad that you have that knowledge, or would you think of it as a waste? Of course, your opinions may change over time, but since you can't know the future, my feeling is that the answer to that question is the biggest indicator of whether or not one should pursue a higher degree.
 
bossman27 said:
I can't claim the wisdom of years quite yet, and I'm not sure just how hard it is to get an academic job, or will be in the future, but I think there's an easy litmus test:

If you couldn't get a job as a professor or researcher, would you still be happy to invest all that time and learn all those things? If you ended up in another industry, would you still be glad that you have that knowledge, or would you think of it as a waste? Of course, your opinions may change over time, but since you can't know the future, my feeling is that the answer to that question is the biggest indicator of whether or not one should pursue a higher degree.

Hmm.. this is a good test! My first instinct now is no... Although I enjoy learning something, I don't like seeing what I learned get flushed down the toilet...

I should seriously reconsider my decision..
 
bossman27 said:
If you couldn't get a job as a professor or researcher, would you still be happy to invest all that time and learn all those things? If you ended up in another industry, would you still be glad that you have that knowledge, or would you think of it as a waste? Of course, your opinions may change over time, but since you can't know the future, my feeling is that the answer to that question is the biggest indicator of whether or not one should pursue a higher degree.

Indeed, the decisions of your life are not merely a means to an end! If you truly enjoy the process of research and such, then the choice is between getting to do what you love for several years or simply not doing it at all.
 
bossman27 said:
I can't claim the wisdom of years quite yet, and I'm not sure just how hard it is to get an academic job, or will be in the future, but I think there's an easy litmus test:

If you couldn't get a job as a professor or researcher, would you still be happy to invest all that time and learn all those things? If you ended up in another industry, would you still be glad that you have that knowledge, or would you think of it as a waste? Of course, your opinions may change over time, but since you can't know the future, my feeling is that the answer to that question is the biggest indicator of whether or not one should pursue a higher degree.

This is a very apt statement. Like you I don't know much about the subject, but in my opinion a good scientist goes through all of the trouble of grad school simply to learn more about the universe we live in. In that case grad school is its own reward, and if it isn't perhaps science in the right path for you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K