Theoretical Particles @ Planck Scale: Is there a maximum wavelength of light?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical limits of frequency and wavelength in the context of electromagnetic waves, specifically at the Planck scale. Participants explore the implications of the equations E = h * f and f = c / wavelength, questioning whether there is a maximum frequency or minimum wavelength. It is concluded that while there may not be a physical limit to frequency, measurement accuracy poses significant constraints. Additionally, the propagation of electromagnetic waves at frequencies below 1 Hz is confirmed, with the understanding that such waves do not exceed the speed of light.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck length and its implications in physics
  • Familiarity with the equations E = h * f and f = c / wavelength
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Basic concepts of frequency and wavelength in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Planck scale physics on electromagnetic theory
  • Study the accuracy limits of frequency measurements in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the characteristics of electromagnetic waves at low frequencies, specifically below 1 Hz
  • Investigate the relationship between frequency and speed of light in various media
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of electromagnetic waves and their measurement limitations.

jrbirch
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
First time poster so please be gentle...

E = h * f
f = c / wavelength

1) Is there a theoretical limit on maximum f (minimum wavelength of Planck length)?
2) Is there a theoretical limit on minimum f of 1 (maximum wavelength of c)? (ie// the maximum distance that a photon can cover in unit time?)
2a) Are there radio waves that exist < 1 Hz?
3) Is it possible to measure E < h ? Is this distinguishable from E = 0?

Thanks.

Background: BSc in Comp. Sci.
I've searched the forums but haven't found anything that covers this...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) I don't think there is a physical limit to the frequency, but there is a limit to how accurately we can measure that frequency.

2) The maximum distance a photon can cover in unit time is determined by the speed of light, unless I'm misunderstanding your question...

2a) Yep -- a 0.5 Hz (cycle per second) signal would have a wavelength equal to the distance EM waves travel through a given medium in 2 seconds.

3) Yes, but I believe a corresponding measurement in time would become extremely inaccurate. I'm not sure about the second part of the question...

Any physicists correct me if I'm wrong (I'm sure you would do that anyway).
 
Hey Runner,

First, thanks for answering.

As to #2/#2a they're both asking pretty much the same thing.

If an EM wave has a frequency .5Hz doesn't that mean that the wave is propagating faster then c (the particles that make up the wave need to travel at 2c)?

Is frequency really just a continuous number or does it have some grounding and constraints in the real world?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
15K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K