Thermodynamics Problem - the lake :P

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a lump of ice falling into a lake at 0 degrees Celsius, with a portion of the ice melting upon impact. Participants are tasked with determining the height from which the ice fell based on energy conservation principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between potential energy and thermal energy, questioning the calculations and units used in the problem. There is an exploration of the melting process and how it relates to the height calculation.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering calculations and questioning unit conversions. There is a recognition of discrepancies between personal calculations and the book's answer, prompting further investigation into the assumptions and methods used.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the specific values for the latent heat of fusion and gravitational acceleration, as well as the need to convert units appropriately. The discussion reflects a mix of SI and cgs units, which may be contributing to the confusion in results.

Planck const
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi.. looks like simple problem but the result i got is unreasonable.

Homework Statement



There is lump of ice, that falling down into a lake that his temperature is 0 celsius degrees.

K of the lump getting melt ( = M that melt/M )

What is the height that from him, the lump fell ?


Homework Equations



Ep = mgy

Q = mc(Delta t)

Q = mL

The Attempt at a Solution



I advocate that

mgy = m*k*(L + t of melting)
(c of the water that melt = 1)
t of melting of water = 0

So

y = KL/g

But when I place the numerical data, the result is completily different from what the writers wrote, as I sad above.

Thanks in advance !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Planck const! :smile:

A lump of ice falls into a lake whose temperature is 0 degrees Celsius.

A proportion K of the mass of the lump melts ( = M that melt/M )

What is the height from which the lump fell ?

Your method looks ok :confused:

perhaps the units needed converting?

Can you show us your own calculations, and also the figure given for L, and the result given in the book?
 
Thanks for the reply!

The initial temperature of the lake water = 0 C deg'
L of water = 79.7 cal/gr
K in the book = 5*10^-3 (no units)
g = 980 cm/sec^2

The answer in the book is the the height, h = 171 m = 17,100 cm (!)

Now all the potential energy become kinetic and its become thermal energy.
The thermal energy that goes from the body to the lake caused from the melting and the change in the temerature...
On those things my calculations were based .
 
Hi Planck const! :smile:

(have a degree: ° and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

How did you convert each of those units (cal/gr and cm/s2) to SI units (or cgs units)?
 
Let's see...
cal = 4.2 J
so I need to multiply L in 4.2
and I get:
h (cm) = K*L*4.2 / g = 4.2 * 5 * 10^-3 * 79.7 / 980
Using pocket calculator, h = 1.83 * 10^-3 (cm) !
In the book - 1.7 * 10^+3

About the math singles in this forum... I am used to the way that I write. Thanks anyway :)
 
\frac{79.7 cal}{g} \times \frac{4.187 J}{cal} \times \frac{1000 g}{kg} = ?
 
Ok

Need erg and not Jaul ...

1 cal = 4.2 J = 4.2*10^7 erg

K*L / g = 5*10^-3 * 79.7 * 4.2*10^7 / 980 = 17,025 cm = 170.25 m

Thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K