Theta Eridani was much brighter for early astronomers

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mfb
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 704 views
Messages
37,495
Reaction score
14,384
TL;DR
Theta Eridani is magnitude 2.9 today, hardly remarkable. Multiple ancient astronomers described it as one of the brightest stars. Recent research found a possible explanation of the discrepancy.
Hipparchus (129 BC), Ptolemy (137 AD) and al-Sufi (964) all described Theta Eridani as one of the brightest stars in the sky. Today it is still visible to the naked eye but unremarkable at magnitude 2.9. A new publication explains the larger historic brightness as mass transfer between two stars in the system, leading to a temporary brightness increase for something like 1000 years:
The forgotten bright star: Theta Eridani as a millenary stellar transient observed by Hipparchus, Ptolemy and al-Sufi
Article discussing the publication

This shows the long-term value of surveys - even if they were done with the naked eye! Many interesting effects only show up if you can compare systems at different times.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
Astronomy news on Phys.org
So this could in fact be related to the Nebra disk?


Ah, the good old days when I received a finger-rapping on an almost daily basis with a slide-rule from V50! :woot:

EDIT: I must've meant 50. Although I'm confused now.
 
Last edited: