Theta Eridani was much brighter for early astronomers

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mfb
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 1K views
Messages
37,544
Reaction score
14,425
TL;DR
Theta Eridani is magnitude 2.9 today, hardly remarkable. Multiple ancient astronomers described it as one of the brightest stars. Recent research found a possible explanation of the discrepancy.
Hipparchus (129 BC), Ptolemy (137 AD) and al-Sufi (964) all described Theta Eridani as one of the brightest stars in the sky. Today it is still visible to the naked eye but unremarkable at magnitude 2.9. A new publication explains the larger historic brightness as mass transfer between two stars in the system, leading to a temporary brightness increase for something like 1000 years:
The forgotten bright star: Theta Eridani as a millenary stellar transient observed by Hipparchus, Ptolemy and al-Sufi
Article discussing the publication

This shows the long-term value of surveys - even if they were done with the naked eye! Many interesting effects only show up if you can compare systems at different times.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
So this could in fact be related to the Nebra disk?


Ah, the good old days when I received a finger-rapping on an almost daily basis with a slide-rule from V50! :woot:

EDIT: I must've meant 50. Although I'm confused now.
 
Last edited: