Thin film interference—find the height of a wedge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the thickness of a wedge formed by two glass plates separated by a piece of paper, illuminated by 510 nm light. The formula used is 2t = mλ, where m is determined by the number of interference fringes observed. With 14 fringes per centimeter over an 11 cm length, the correct calculation for m is 15.4, leading to a thickness t of approximately 3.927 micrometers. The final value confirms the thickness is indeed very thin, consistent with the properties of the wedge interference phenomenon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thin film interference principles
  • Familiarity with the wavelength of light (510 nm)
  • Knowledge of interference fringe calculations
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the thin film interference equation 2t = mλ
  • Learn about the impact of varying wavelengths on interference patterns
  • Explore applications of thin film interference in optical coatings
  • Investigate methods for measuring thin film thickness accurately
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying optics, as well as educators and professionals involved in optical engineering or materials science.

madfelice

Homework Statement


Two rectangular pieces of plane glass 11.0 cm long are laid upon the other on a table. At one end they are in contact, at the other end they are separated by a piece of paper, which forms a thin wedge of air. The plates are illuminated at normal incidence by 510 nm light. Interference fringes are observed with 14.0 fringes per centimetre. Find the thickness of the piece of paper.

Homework Equations



2t=m*λ

The Attempt at a Solution


ok, so if I take 2t=m*λ
m=14/0.01*0.011(not sure I have the right number here?)=15.4
so t=(m*λ)/2
t = (15.4(510e-9))/2
t = 3.927e-6
do I have it right or have I messed up m=
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there are 14 fringes per centimeter, how many fringes are there on 11 cm ?
 
I think I have figured it out, I should be multiplying by 0.11, not 0.011, right? That gives me the same answer but one decimal place difference.
 
A factor 10 bigger does not constitute 'the same answer'

It's still a very thin sheet of paper, but no longer unlikely.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K