Thin film interference—find the height of a wedge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves thin film interference with two glass plates creating a wedge of air, illuminated by light of a specific wavelength. The objective is to determine the thickness of a piece of paper that separates the plates, based on observed interference fringes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the fringe order and the relationship between the number of fringes and the thickness of the paper. There is uncertainty regarding the correct multiplication factor for the length of the glass plates.

Discussion Status

Some participants are exploring different interpretations of the fringe count and its implications for the thickness calculation. There is an ongoing examination of the values used in the calculations, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with specific constraints, such as the dimensions of the glass plates and the wavelength of light used. There is also a focus on the accuracy of the fringe count and its impact on the final result.

madfelice

Homework Statement


Two rectangular pieces of plane glass 11.0 cm long are laid upon the other on a table. At one end they are in contact, at the other end they are separated by a piece of paper, which forms a thin wedge of air. The plates are illuminated at normal incidence by 510 nm light. Interference fringes are observed with 14.0 fringes per centimetre. Find the thickness of the piece of paper.

Homework Equations



2t=m*λ

The Attempt at a Solution


ok, so if I take 2t=m*λ
m=14/0.01*0.011(not sure I have the right number here?)=15.4
so t=(m*λ)/2
t = (15.4(510e-9))/2
t = 3.927e-6
do I have it right or have I messed up m=
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there are 14 fringes per centimeter, how many fringes are there on 11 cm ?
 
I think I have figured it out, I should be multiplying by 0.11, not 0.011, right? That gives me the same answer but one decimal place difference.
 
A factor 10 bigger does not constitute 'the same answer'

It's still a very thin sheet of paper, but no longer unlikely.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K