This Fourier Transfer Function properties?.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of the Fabry-Perot Transfer Function, specifically the function T(ω) = e^(iωτ) / (1 - ρe^(i2ωτ)). When τ is real, the function exhibits a clear inverse transform, resulting in a delay and a series of deltas. However, if τ is complex, indicating an absorbing medium, the function becomes frequency-dependent, violating the Kramers-Kronig relation. Consequently, the inverse Fourier Transform of T(ω) lacks a straightforward analytical expression, complicating its representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier Transforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Fabry-Perot resonator and its applications
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their implications in physical systems
  • Basic principles of optics, particularly the behavior of light in absorbing media
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Kramers-Kronig relations and their significance in optics
  • Explore the implications of complex refractive indices in wave propagation
  • Investigate the inverse Fourier Transform of complex functions
  • Examine the behavior of the Fabry-Perot resonator under various medium conditions
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers working in optics, particularly those involved in the analysis of resonant systems and wave propagation in complex media.

monchosoad
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi Everyone. I want to know what do you think about this Transfer function:

T(\omega) = \frac{e^{i\omega\tau}}{1-\rho e^{i2\omega\tau}}

If\tau is Real, this function is "good and pretty"(?), because it has a "nice" representation in time with its inverse transform: a delay plus a series of deltas displaced in time in n\tau times \rho^n.
But the question is: What about if \tau is Complex?? Is there a magical property that I'm missing to deal with this?

Sorry if i was mistaken on the election of the Forum. I don't know if this question may be in "Physics" because T(\omega) is the Fabry-Perot Transfer Function, or in Engineering. And sorry for my English.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The simplest case of a FP resonator is that when the medium in between the mirrors is just vacuum, in that case ##\tau## is a constant with respect to frequency. By invoking that ##\tau## be complex (which physically means the intermediate medium is absorbing), this implies that this quantity must also be a function of frequency - there is no occurrence in reality where the index of refraction contained in ##\tau## is a constant complex number as this would violate Kramers-Kronig relation. Furthermore, there is no closed form of the dependence of refractive index on frequency as this is medium specific, so if ##\tau## is complex which also means ##\tau## is frequency dependent, the inverse FT of ##T(\omega)## won't be as nice as it is for free space case and I believe its analytical expression does not exist.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K