This may be ridiculous but I am just starting to learn Calculus.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loismustdie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of continuity in calculus, particularly what it means for a function to be continuous at a point and how this relates to the continuity of the function over its entire domain. Participants explore definitions, examples, and implications of continuity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the definition of continuity, specifically how knowing a function is continuous at a point does not imply it is continuous everywhere.
  • Another participant states that a function is continuous at all points if the continuity condition holds for all points in its domain.
  • A participant provides an example of a function that is continuous at a single point but not elsewhere, questioning the generality of continuity.
  • One participant argues against the previous example, suggesting that the function should be continuous at all irrational points but discontinuous at rational points, and proposes a proof for continuity at irrationals.
  • Another participant acknowledges a mistake in their earlier claim regarding continuity.
  • A participant introduces a more formal definition of continuity, emphasizing that a function is continuous if it satisfies the continuity condition at every point in its domain.
  • Discussion includes a critique of the traditional geometric interpretation of continuity, highlighting cases where functions are continuous yet difficult to visualize.
  • An example function is presented that is continuous only at a specific point, with a suggestion to visualize the graph for better understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of continuity, with some agreeing on definitions while others present competing views and examples. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of continuity at specific points versus the entire function.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific mathematical definitions and theorems, but there are unresolved assumptions and conditions regarding the continuity of functions, particularly in relation to their domains.

Loismustdie
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
This may be ridiculous but I am just starting to learn Calculus.
Anyway I am learning continuity and they say the function is continuous at a certain point c. What I want to know is what does this mean, and how do you know if the function is completely continuous.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For starters, have you bothered to read the definition of continuity?
 
yeah but I am still confused about continuity. If you could answer my question maybe I would know
 
Vague confusions are not easily resolved!

Please pick up your book again, and state what SPECIFICALLY is unclear to you about the definition of continuity!
 
My books definition states that "A function f(x) is continuous at x=c if lim(x->c)f(x)=f(c)." What I am confused about is that if it is continuous at the point x=c how do you know if the whole function is continuous and not just at x=c.

Help me if this can be explained, if not I will just drop it.
 
The function is continuous at all points if the above holds for all c.
 
"What I am confused about is that if it is continuous at the point x=c how do you know if the whole function is continuous and not just at x=c.
"

In order to know that the function is continuous at ALL its points, then it has to fulfill the condition of continuity at a point everywhere.
 
Loismustdie said:
My books definition states that "A function f(x) is continuous at x=c if lim(x->c)f(x)=f(c)." What I am confused about is that if it is continuous at the point x=c how do you know if the whole function is continuous and not just at x=c.

Help me if this can be explained, if not I will just drop it.
If all you know is that f is continuous at x= c, then you do not know anything about whether it is continuous for other x. For example, the function f(x)= 1/n if x= m/n reduced to lowest terms, f(x)= 0 if x is irrational is continuous at x= 0 but no where else. (I think!)
 
I don't agree, Halls!
Your function ought to be continuous on all irrationals, but discontinuous at the rationals.

Discontinuity at the rationals is trivial, here's how I think a proof of continuity at the irrationals might go:

1. Given an irrational a, for every N, there exists a D(N)>0 so that the punctured disk about a with radius D(N) do not contain any rationals of the form m/N.
2. Given E>0, choose 1/N<E
For n=1,...N, find the minimum radius D(n*).
3. Thus, only rationals with denominator N+1 or greater will be included in the indicated punctured disk, by whom the associated function values will be less than E.

Hence, continuity at the irrationals is proven.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Okay, arildno, I concede. I had a suspicion I was wrong when I wrote that!
 
  • #11
Hi
I think that you imagine continuty as a geometrical concept.thus you think about that the founctions`s graph is a continuous one or not.
In strict mathematical conception , a (whole) function is continuous if for every point c in it`s domain satisfy continouty condition.
( in the parantesis in the calculus there is atheoreom that is say : if f(x) is continuous in the interval [a,b] and f(a)=k1 and f(b)=k2; then for every k in which k1<k<k2 (or k2<k<k1) , there is a c in [a.b] in which f(c)= k)
 
  • #12
Well, the idea that the graph of a conintuous function is something you can draw without lifting your pen is rather outmoded.

Furthermore, looking at nastinesses like the continuous, nowhere differentiable Weierstrass function drawing the graph becomes everywhere impossible!

Also, if the domain is not connected, then the graph of a continuous function looks not at all..connected.
 
  • #13
a nice example is f(x) = x if x is rational, and f9x) = -x if x is irrational.

this function is con tinuous only at x=0, and is proabbly the exampel halls was thinking of.

try to draw the graph and you will get a better idea of what con tinuity means.

i.e. f(0) can be approximated by any f(x) for any x near enough to x=0, but this is not true anywhere else.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K