This summation sums to zero. Why?

In summary, the authors claim that the given equation holds for positive numbers lambda, r between 1 and L, but this is not always the case. They ask for more information or hints on how to prove this. However, the claim is not correct in some cases, as shown by a counterexample where lambda(m) is defined as m and L=r=2.
  • #1
EngWiPy
1,368
61
Hi,

I am reading a paper, and at some point the authors claim that:

[tex]\sum_{m=1}^{L+1}\frac{\prod_{\substack{l=1\\l\neq m}}^{L+1}\frac{\lambda(m)}{\lambda(m)-\lambda(l)}}{\lambda^r(m)}=0[/tex]

the question is HOW?

Any tiny hint will be highly appreciated.

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In general there is no equality.
It must depend on the definitions of λ, r and L.
Can you provide more details?
 
  • #3
Amir Livne said:
In general there is no equality.
It must depend on the definitions of λ, r and L.
Can you provide more details?

Lambdas are positive numbers, r is between 1 and L. That is all
 
  • #4
I don't think that is correct.

Define [itex]\lambda(m)=m[/itex], and pick [itex]L=r=2[/itex]. Then
[tex]\frac{\frac{\lambda(1)}{\left(\lambda(1)-\lambda(2)\right)\left(\lambda(1)-\lambda(3)\right)}}{\lambda(1)^2}+\frac{\frac{\lambda(2)}{\left(\lambda(2)-\lambda(1)\right)\left(\lambda(2)-\lambda(3)\right)}}{\lambda(2)^2}+\frac{\frac{\lambda(3)}{\left(\lambda(3)-\lambda(1)\right)\left(\lambda(3)-\lambda(2)\right)}}{\lambda(3)^2}=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{6}=\frac{1}{6}[/tex]
 
  • #5


The reason this summation sums to zero is likely due to the fact that it is a telescoping series. This means that many terms in the summation will cancel each other out, leaving only the first and last terms. In this case, the first term is \frac{\prod_{\substack{l=1\\l\neq m}}^{L+1}\frac{\lambda(m)}{\lambda(m)-\lambda(l)}}{\lambda^r(m)} when m=1, and the last term is \frac{\prod_{\substack{l=1\\l\neq m}}^{L+1}\frac{\lambda(m)}{\lambda(m)-\lambda(l)}}{\lambda^r(m)} when m=L+1. These two terms will cancel each other out, resulting in a sum of zero. However, without more context or information about the specific variables and functions involved, it is difficult to provide a more detailed explanation. I recommend consulting with the authors or a mathematics expert for further clarification.
 

1. Why does this summation sum to zero?

The summation sums to zero because the terms being added together have opposite signs, canceling each other out. This is known as the "zero-sum property" in mathematics.

2. Can you provide an example of a summation that sums to zero?

One example is the sum of all the positive and negative integers from -5 to 5. The positive and negative integers will cancel each other out, resulting in a sum of zero.

3. Is there a formula or rule for a summation to sum to zero?

Yes, there is a formula called the "arithmetic sum formula" that can be used to determine if a summation will sum to zero. It states that if the number of terms is even, and the first and last terms are opposite in sign, then the summation will sum to zero.

4. What is the significance of a summation summing to zero?

A summation summing to zero can indicate that there is a balance or equilibrium between the positive and negative quantities being added together. It can also be used to solve equations and prove mathematical theorems.

5. Are there any real-world applications of a summation summing to zero?

Yes, there are many real-world applications of this concept. For example, in physics, the principle of conservation of energy states that the total energy of a closed system must remain constant, or in other words, sum to zero. This principle relies on the principle of a summation summing to zero.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
604
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
793
Replies
3
Views
722
  • General Math
Replies
3
Views
806
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
750
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
731
Back
Top