A Thorium-229's excited state at 8.355733554021(8) eV

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter mfb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ev
Messages
37,374
Reaction score
14,209
TL;DR Summary
Frequency comb measurements of thorium's unusually low excited state have measured its energy much more precisely.
Missed this on arXiv, now it's published: Frequency ratio of the 229mTh nuclear isomeric transition and the 87Sr atomic clock
They measure the frequency of the transition radiation with an uncertainty of just 2 kHz or 1 part in a trillion. That's not beating the best atomic clocks yet, but it shows that you can measure this transition with the tools used for atomic clocks - and then exploit the better stability you get from using nuclei instead of atoms.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, .Scott, Astronuc and 2 others
Physics news on Phys.org
mfb said:
TL;DR Summary: Frequency comb measurements of thorium's unusually low excited state have measured its energy much more precisely.

Missed this on arXiv, now it's published: Frequency ratio of the 229mTh nuclear isomeric transition and the 87Sr atomic clock
They measure the frequency of the transition radiation with an uncertainty of just 2 keV or 1 part in a trillion. That's not beating the best atomic clocks yet, but it shows that you can measure this transition with the tools used for atomic clocks - and then exploit the better stability you get from using nuclei instead of atoms.
Out of respect for the folks who did the work, the authors of the new paper (in the journal Nature) are:
  • Chuankun Zhang,
  • Tian Ooi,
  • Jacob S. Higgins,
  • Jack F. Doyle,
  • Lars von der Wense,
  • Kjeld Beeks,
  • Adrian Leitner,
  • Georgy A. Kazakov,
  • Peng Li,
  • Peter G. Thirolf,
  • Thorsten Schumm &
  • Jun Ye
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top