A Thorium-229's excited state at 8.355733554021(8) eV

  • Thread starter Thread starter mfb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ev
Click For Summary
Recent research published in Nature details the precise measurement of the frequency ratio of the 229mTh nuclear isomeric transition compared to the 87Sr atomic clock, achieving an uncertainty of just 2 kHz, or 1 part in a trillion. While this precision does not surpass the best atomic clocks, it demonstrates the capability to measure nuclear transitions using atomic clock technology. The findings suggest that utilizing nuclei could enhance stability in timekeeping. The study highlights thorium's unusually low excited state, which has been measured with unprecedented accuracy. This research opens avenues for future advancements in atomic clock technology and nuclear physics.
Messages
37,394
Reaction score
14,224
TL;DR
Frequency comb measurements of thorium's unusually low excited state have measured its energy much more precisely.
Missed this on arXiv, now it's published: Frequency ratio of the 229mTh nuclear isomeric transition and the 87Sr atomic clock
They measure the frequency of the transition radiation with an uncertainty of just 2 kHz or 1 part in a trillion. That's not beating the best atomic clocks yet, but it shows that you can measure this transition with the tools used for atomic clocks - and then exploit the better stability you get from using nuclei instead of atoms.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, .Scott, Astronuc and 2 others
Physics news on Phys.org
mfb said:
TL;DR Summary: Frequency comb measurements of thorium's unusually low excited state have measured its energy much more precisely.

Missed this on arXiv, now it's published: Frequency ratio of the 229mTh nuclear isomeric transition and the 87Sr atomic clock
They measure the frequency of the transition radiation with an uncertainty of just 2 keV or 1 part in a trillion. That's not beating the best atomic clocks yet, but it shows that you can measure this transition with the tools used for atomic clocks - and then exploit the better stability you get from using nuclei instead of atoms.
Out of respect for the folks who did the work, the authors of the new paper (in the journal Nature) are:
  • Chuankun Zhang,
  • Tian Ooi,
  • Jacob S. Higgins,
  • Jack F. Doyle,
  • Lars von der Wense,
  • Kjeld Beeks,
  • Adrian Leitner,
  • Georgy A. Kazakov,
  • Peng Li,
  • Peter G. Thirolf,
  • Thorsten Schumm &
  • Jun Ye
 
Hi everyone, I am doing a final project on the title " fundamentals of neutrino physics". I wanted to raise some issues with neutrino which makes it the possible way to the physics beyond standard model. I am myself doing some research on these topics but at some points the math bugs me out. Anyway, i have some questions which answers themselves confounded me due to the complicated math. Some pf them are: 1. Why wouldn't there be a mirror image of a neutrino? Is it because they are...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
490
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
Replies
62
Views
10K