Thorium Fission: Overcoming Hurdles to Power

  • Thread starter Thread starter #Thomas#
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 2K views
#Thomas#
Messages
35
Reaction score
2
Greetings,

I am curious, what is keeping us from having thorium fission reactors? What are the hurdles that we need to overcome?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Economic. Uranium infrastructure is extant. Technological, molten solid coolant is problematic.
 
What else are we going to do with uranium anyways.
 
There's also the political angle. Just as nuclear power was starting to get popular again, Fukushima Daiichi happened, which is a real shame. If I recall, the thorium cycle produces less waste, is more abundant on the planet, and cannot be weaponized (or not very easily), so it has little to no proliferation concerns.
 
#Thomas# said:
Greetings,

I am curious, what is keeping us from having thorium fission reactors? What are the hurdles that we need to overcome?

One big obstacle is that thorium itself doesn't fission. Thorium-232 captures a neutron and then decays into U-233, which is capable of fission. However, this decay process involves the emission of gamma radiation, which makes handling irradiated Th-232 material very dangerous.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium_fuel_cycle

The irradiation of thorium also produces U-232, which is not fissile, but which also produces gamma rays as it decays.

All in all, thorium is not the cheap nuclear fuel which has been portrayed by some.
 
Alright then, 2 more follow up questions:

1) Does it really have to be molten solid coolant? Whats wrong with using thorium with water coolant? And why is liquefied solid coolant such a big problem, I know of at least 1 place where it is in use, the solar tower in spain...

2) How long is the decay of the thorium waste compared to uranium?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kelson Adams
Fission byproducts, waste, are a spectrum. A long lived thorium waste product is 232 Pa with a half-life of 32,760 years. But a long half-life makes for a lower specific activity.

Molten coolant is often the solvent for the dissolved fuel.

Coolant other than water will become activated, radioactive, a leak then is a leak of solidifying radioactive material. See the Monju disaster.
 
Last edited:
Ahh, yes, makes sense, to stiffen up is a lot better than to spill around. But what are the problems with implementation? I know that there's a solar tower in spain that uses molten salt to generate power when there is no sunlight, like at night.