Thought-Experiment with illustration - help me understand

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lovenugget
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving a spaceship orbiting Earth while accelerating to 99% the speed of light and then decelerating. Participants explore what an observer would see on playback of a video recording made during this journey, particularly in relation to time dilation effects and the perception of Earth's aging.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that during playback of the recording, the observer would see Earth aging rapidly due to time dilation effects.
  • Others argue that while orbiting at 99% the speed of light is physically impossible, for the sake of the thought experiment, one can ignore this fact and focus on the visual outcomes.
  • A participant mentions that if traveling away from Earth at 99%, time would appear to run faster on Earth, leading to a playback that seems sped up.
  • Another participant notes that the transition from 99% to 1% of the speed of light is trivial in terms of the relative motion experienced during the orbit.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of the "twin paradox" and how acceleration affects aging in different frames of reference.
  • It is noted that signals received from Earth would be blueshifted, affecting the visual representation on playback.
  • One participant provides links to external resources, including a paper with supporting math and images related to the thought experiment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the playback would show Earth aging rapidly due to time dilation effects, but there are competing views on the feasibility of the scenario and the specifics of what would be observed during acceleration and deceleration. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact visual outcomes and implications of the thought experiment.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the feasibility of orbiting at relativistic speeds and the complexities of visual perception under extreme conditions, which are not fully resolved in the discussion.

lovenugget
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
The setup: You're in a spaceship rocketing around the earth, never breaking orbit. You have a video recorder constantly pointing inward toward the earth, capturing the events. You then begin accelerating to 99% the speed of light. After a few hours at this speed you decelerate to 1% c.

[URL]http://img827.imageshack.us/i/063011125454.jpg/[/URL]

What i want to know is this: What do I see when I play back the recording? Shouldn't i see the Earth rapidly aging due to the effects of time dilation?

I tried to get a solid answer from my physics teacher, but I'm not certain i adequately explained the perameters of the thought-experiment and never received a satisfying answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
lovenugget said:
The setup: You're in a spaceship rocketing around the earth, never breaking orbit. You have a video recorder constantly pointing inward toward the earth, capturing the events. You then begin accelerating to 99% the speed of light. After a few hours at this speed you decelerate to 1% c.

[URL]http://img827.imageshack.us/i/063011125454.jpg/[/URL]

What i want to know is this: What do I see when I play back the recording? Due to time dilation shouldn't i see the Earth rapidly aging due to the effects of time dilation?

I tried to get a solid answer from my physics teacher, but I'm not certain i adequately explained the perameters of the thought-experiment and never received a satisfying answer.

I think the first problem is that I don't believe that you could orbit the Earth at 99% c. The escape velocity is much less than that so you would propel yourself into space.

However, what you would probably see if you were traveling away from the Earth at 99% is that time would appear to be running faster on earth. So when you playback your video it would seem like you were watching a speeded up version.

What I am not sure about (And I am sure that someone here will set me straight!) is what you would see whilst you accelerated, then traveled at a constant speed and then decelerated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I understand that it would be physically impossible to stay in orbit around the Earth at 99% the speed of light... with this being a thought experiment I would like to ignore that fact. remember, the spaceship never leaves the orbit. it just keeps racing around the Earth during the acceleration/deceleration... I'm mainly interested in what i would see as the ship begins to decelerate from 99% c.
 
Last edited:
The question relates to what an observer would see on the rim of a great spinning wheel. I know that Misner/Thorne/Wheeler discussed this in section 2.8 of Gravitation, but I've long since sent the great tome back to the library.

I had some thoughts on the idea, myself, including some space-time diagrams, they are posted here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=432025&page=2 in the thread "Relativistic Bike"

(And Yes, absolutely, you would see the Earth rapidly aging.)
 
Oh, and I managed to get to your image; it's attached in the thumbnail.

One small point to make is, going from 99% of the speed of light to 1% of the speed of light is a trivial matter, when you consider that as you circle, you're going from .99c one way to .99c the other way.

Another point to make is that in the "twin paradox" it is the acceleration of the traveling twin that makes him end up being young while the other is old.

Another point to make is the proper-time on board your space-ship is growing very slowly compared to the Earth frame:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_time#In_special_relativity
 

Attachments

  • 063011125454.jpg
    063011125454.jpg
    21.8 KB · Views: 467
You couldn't do an unpowered orbit around the Earth at 99%c, but for the purposes of this experiment, you could do a powered orbit, where your rocketship provides the thrust needed to stay in orbit.

The signals you received from the Earth would be blueshifted, shifted higher in frequency. The resulting pictures would also appear as if they were being played back in a recorder at high speed, once you corrected for the doppler shifting of the frequency.

If the nose of your spaceship was always pointed in the direction of the orbit (somewhat unlikely, but easy to visualize), the Earth would not appear to be at right angles, but somewhat ahead of you. The rest of the stars would be concentrated in a small disk in front of you, similar to this picture:

http://www.exo.net/~pauld/stars/PD_images_relativ.html

This paper also has some black and white images, and the supporting math:
http://cartan.e-moka.net/content/download/248/1479/file/Astronave relativistica.pdf

The only thing that you really need to know to answer your original question is whether the light from the Earth is blue-shifted or red-shifted, the results in the paper are interesting but might be a bit advanced for high school - fun to look at the pictures, though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you all for your responses and for confirming what I imagined would happen. I looked at the mathematica notebooks you posted on the other thread Doolin. I really like mathematica and I'm interested in finding more (more like a collection) of mathematica notebooks relating to physics. Does anyone know where i can find more?
 
  • #10
wow I'm not sure how i managed to overlook the demonstration page you provided. I've been looking for a similar page for months. i think it's great that they're made available to everyone, as opposed to being hoarded which the contributors and wolfram could easily have done. much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K