Admissions Thoughts/Help on DOE CCI application for specific project areas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a second-year community college student applying for the DOE CCI summer internship and seeking advice on aligning their lab choices with the program's priorities. The student is specifically interested in Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) but notes that their preferred technical project areas—biotechnology, nanotechnology, and engineering technology—are not listed as priorities on the DOE CCI application page. Participants emphasize the importance of aligning project choices with the lab's priorities, suggesting that if there is a mismatch, the student should consider applying to different labs. Additionally, the discussion highlights that the number of applicants for a project can influence acceptance chances, indicating that fewer applicants may improve the likelihood of selection.
Hopper_18
Messages
5
Reaction score
5
Hello, I am currently a second year community college student applying for the DOE CCI summer internship. I was wondering if anyone had any idea of the priority of the labs will determine if I accepted. By this I mean, for example, I was applying to Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) for the technical project areas of biotechnology (non medical), nanotechnology, and engineering technology -biological, but on the DOE CCI application page it has a pdf where neither of those three are listed as priorities. Link here https://science.osti.gov/-/media/wdts/cci/pdf/CCI---Project-Areas-by-Lab---last-updated-10-2022.pdf
To get to that pdf is found here under priority
https://science.osti.gov/wdts/cci/How-to-Apply/Selecting-a-Host-DOE-Laboratory/
Should I change the labs I’m applying to in order for my technical project choices to line up with the specific priorities of the National Lab, or does it not matter? Thank you for any information that can be provided.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your priorities do not line up with the national labs priorities, I wouldn't apply there. I'd apply someplace else.
 
Dr Transport said:
If your priorities do not line up with the national labs priorities, I wouldn't apply there. I'd apply someplace else.
This.

Also, if a Lab has one opening for a project and two applicants, your chances are better than if there ten applicants. It is possible for something to matter without that being actionable.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top