Thoughts on magnetic fields and life on planets.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the implications of magnetic fields on life on planets, particularly focusing on Jupiter's magnetic field and the potential for life on multipolar planets. The conversation highlights that while radiation from solar winds poses a threat to life, organisms on Earth, such as those at mid-ocean vents, thrive in extreme conditions. The participants emphasize the lack of verifiable research on multipolar planets and the instability of multiple magnetic poles, suggesting that such conditions may not support long-term life.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic fields and their properties
  • Familiarity with solar wind and its effects on planetary atmospheres
  • Knowledge of extremophiles and their habitats, particularly in relation to radiation
  • Basic concepts of geomagnetic reversals and their historical significance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of solar wind on planetary atmospheres, specifically during geomagnetic reversals
  • Investigate extremophiles and their adaptations to extreme environmental conditions
  • Explore the concept of non-carbon based life forms and their potential resilience to radiation
  • Study the stability of magnetic fields in celestial bodies and their implications for habitability
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrobiologists, planetary scientists, and anyone interested in the relationship between magnetic fields and the potential for life on other planets.

unusually_wrong
Messages
37
Reaction score
7
After reading about Jupiter's magnetic field on ScienceAlert, I remembered another article about tree bark and magnetic anomalies (links below). I also remembered an article on birds being able to see magnetic fields as well. It got me thinking of how and if life is possible on anything other than a dipolar planet.What are your thoughts on this and my apologies if this is posted in a wrong section.
https://www.sciencealert.com/jupiter-magnetic-field-asymmetrical-great-blue-spot-juno-strange-dynamo

https://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/691/cv/kletetschka/Trunks.pdf
 
Biology news on Phys.org
It is true that radiation from the solar wind would be harmful to life as we know it. But non-carbon based life forms have been discussed many times on past PF threads. Lacking details, its hard to say how sensitive they might be to radiation.

It is also true that we have life on Earth at the mid-ocean vents so deep in water as to be unaffected by radiation at the surface.

So it comes down to the perpetually elusive problem, Provide an all-inclusive definition of life.
 
I mean more of a planet with multiple magnetic poles. I wonder how anything from single cell to just plant life would be affected (not by the radiation, but the magnetic fields themselves).
 
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1546763 from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal

NASA_54559main_comparison1_strip.gif


That implies that Earth had multiple pole pairs at least transiently during pole reversal events. Since we are here, that is evidence that it did not wipe out life on Earth. But it does not prove that it did not have some effect.
 

Attachments

  • NASA_54559main_comparison1_strip.gif
    NASA_54559main_comparison1_strip.gif
    59.2 KB · Views: 461
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unusually_wrong
Sure, but we're mostly a dipolar planet. I speak of planets that are multipolar.
 
I cannot find anything on the topic. Since you insist on multipolar planets and worded your title the way you did, which says 'let us speculate', I'm moving the thread to GD. It is not science-based. We want verifiable research from journals and standard textbooks.
 
The only article (not published) is noted here: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4985-solar-wind-to-shield-earth-during-pole-flip/
This means the paper had problems, since it did not make it into publication. As far as I can tell.

The pop science article says that during pole flip ( when there are multiple poles), Most of the solar wind is still deflected.

So we do not have any real reason to consider multipole planets this way, it appears. Plus, no good publications really being the primary reason.
 
Multiple magnetic poles while possible is an unstable condition that can't last very long.
I tried it with fridge magnets and always they collapse to something stable.
 

Similar threads

What colors and attributes could alien flora & fauna have?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K