Danger said:
Are you trying to tell me that by your standards, you
haven't been loopy all these past few months?
Not
as loopy. Just wait until you see the sort of replies I post by tomorrow night! They'll make your head spin!
Oh, I just remembered the sort of emails I used to send to one of my friends when I was still in grad school and would be writing to him while trying to keep myself awake through all-night experiments. I'd get these replies back like, "What the hell was that?" I'd have sent emails about 4 or 5 pages long that just jumped from one topic to another in a stream of consciousness style about the most mundane topics that you'd think nobody could spend 4 pages writing about.
Then again, I could just claim I was practicing to be professorial.

Speaking of which, I got a review back on a manuscript this week with the most bizarre lecture about nomenclature! The journal changed their policy on nomenclature since I submitted it (it's really new because the articles even in the most recent issue don't reflect this change yet, so it's not like I could have known this before submitting the article), so all I needed to be provided was a link to the site with the approved nomenclature and a sentence informing me of the policy. The editor went on for about 5 paragraphs about the importance of nomenclature (nevermind that when I did a search using the nomenclature they want me to use, only 9 articles came up out of the thousands on the topic...I don't know what nitwit renamed everything, but apparently this journal wants us to play along.

I'll just make sure I define both the new nomenclature and the protein names everyone actually knows and uses). When I sent the comments out to my co-authors, ALL of them replied with some pretty funny remarks about the lecture. There has GOT to be a better use of one's time! Oh well, I got a good laugh about it and the reviewers' comments were incredibly minimal, so there should be no problem making the revisions and finally getting it published.
After the manuscript is accepted, I'll talk to the editor about his over-the-top lecture...it could be construed as incredibly condescending; I just happen to know he's the sort of person who would get hung up on details like that so don't take it personally, but someone else might not take it as well.
(Ha ha...see, I'm already rambling!)