Three point charges are arranged on a line.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three point charges arranged linearly, with specific values and positions given for two charges. The objective is to determine the magnitude and sign of the third charge such that the net force on one of the charges is zero.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Coulomb's law and the need to consider the distances between the charges. There is a focus on ensuring the correct distances are used in calculations and the implications of the net force being zero.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the original poster's assumptions about distance and the application of Coulomb's law. Suggestions have been made to clarify the setup and to draw diagrams to visualize the forces acting on the charges.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of accurately determining the distances between the charges, as well as the implications of the net force condition on charge Q3. There is an emphasis on the need for careful interpretation of the problem setup.

Mdhiggenz
Messages
324
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Three point charges are arranged on a line. Charge q3 = +5.00nC and is at the origin. Charge q2 = -4.00nC and is at x = 4.50cm . Charge q1 is at x = 2.00cm.

What is q1 (magnitude and sign) if the net force on q3 is zero?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So first thing I did was draw a diagram where q3 was located at (0,0) q1 at (2.00cm,0) and q2 was located at (4.50cm,0)

Then after looking at the problem for a while I know I must use coulomb's law however since the net for q3 is 0 that threw me off a bit.

So what I decided to do was make two separate coulomb's law equations and equal them to each other.

(q1)^2/r^2=(q2)^2/r^2

Ultimately solving for q1 gives.

q1= √[(q2)^2*(r1^2)/r2^2]

Not sure if I'm on the right track just brainstorming, much help is appreciated

Higgenz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you use the same r for (q1, q3) and (q2, q3)? What it should it really be in these two cases?
 
Wouldn't the distance for q3 be 0 since it is at (0,0)?

Only thing else I can think of is maybe getting the distance of Q1 and Q2 and possibly use Pythagoras theorem to get the total distance?
 
You need to find the forces on charge Q_3 due to charges Q_1 and Q_2. What does r in Coulombs Law actually represent?
 
You need the distance between q1 and q3 and between q2 and q3. They are all on the same line. You are given their distances from the beginning of the line. Moreover, q3 is at the beginning of the line. If you still can't figure it out, take a piece of paper and pencil and sketch it.
 
I would suggest drawing a diagram, showing the directions of the forces on Q_3 due to Q_1 and Q_2. Because you know the net force on Q_3 is 0, it should be quite obvious what direction the force on Q_3 due to Q_1 is and from this you can infer the polarity of Q_1.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K