Three points at the vertices of equilateral triangle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the motion of three particles located at the vertices of an equilateral triangle, focusing on their relative velocities and paths as they converge towards the center of the triangle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between relative velocity and the distance between particles, questioning how the particles can meet despite their changing directions. They discuss the geometry of their paths and the implications of symmetry in the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the nature of the spiral paths taken by the particles and the significance of the angles involved. There is an ongoing exploration of the components of motion and how they affect the convergence of the particles.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the assumptions made regarding the motion of the particles, particularly concerning the perpendicular components of their velocities and how these do not affect the distance between them. Some participants express confusion about the implications of these motions.

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement



upload_2017-7-12_23-44-19.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The direction of motion of all the three particles are changing w.r.t. lab frame.
But , their relative velocity remains constant.
relative velocity = vb - va

And the distance between the two particles decreases from a to 0.

So, t = a/|vb - va| I am not clear why I am taking this step. I just feel tempted to take it.
|vb - va| = (√3)v

t = a/(√3)v

W.r.t. A's frame of reference , B is always moving at an angle 60° to the line joining A and B. Then, how can the two ever meet?After seeing the answer (which is 2a/3v)in the book,

Due to the symmetry of the problem, the three will converge at the centre of the triangle.

The distance between the center and the vertices is a/√3.

This is the magnitude of the displacement traveled by each point.

So, taking t = (a/√3)/ [|vb - va| = (√3)v]
= a/3v

Even now, I am missing a factor of 2.

I know that the relative velocity is constant and the displacement of each particle but I can't connect the two information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For each unit you travel along your path, how far towards the center do you travel?
That ratio needs to be multiplied by your a/sqrt(3) to get the total path length.
 
Each point is spiraling in towards the center. And you need to know the length of that spiral path.
At every moment in time, the rate of descent towards the center is proportional to the rate along the spiral. That ratio can be determined by comparing its path to a path that simply orbits the center in a circular motion. The spiral and the circle will meet at a particular angle. What is that angle?
Since the rate of descent is always proportional to the distance traveled, the length of that spiral is proportional to the initial radius r=a/√3.
 
Pushoam said:
the relative velocity is constant
Right. Consider two particles. Think about components of their relative velocity. Which component is of interest?
.Scott said:
you need to know the length of that spiral path.
No, it's easier than that.
 
haruspex said:
Which component is of interest?

W.r.t. A's frame of reference ,

B is always moving at an angle 60° to the line joining A and B.
For meeting A, B travels along BA a distance 'a' with speed 3v/2.
Hence, t = 2a/3v

So, the problem is solved.
But, I did't understand how B can meet A as B is also moving perpendicular to BA with speed (√3)v/2. Please explain this.
 
Pushoam said:
I did't understand how B can meet A as B is also moving perpendicular to BA
in each short interval of time, dt, the movement that B makes perpendicular to AB does not alter the distance between them. A cancels the effect of that movement merely by changing direction slightly.
 
haruspex said:
in each short interval of time, dt, the movement that B makes perpendicular to AB does not alter the distance between them. A cancels the effect of that movement merely by changing direction slightly.
This I didn't understand.

W.r.t. A's frame,
B moves towards A along BA and away from A along perpendicular to AB. (Please, correct it if this sentence is not proper grammatically.)
Thus, the motion in perpendicular direction always remains away from A. So, how could B meet A?
 
Pushoam said:
away from A along perpendicular to AB
A very small movement perpendicular to AB is not away from A. It is neutral.
If you stand still at A and person B moves always perpendicular to AB then that person goes around in a circle, always at the same radius from you.
 
haruspex said:
If you stand still at A and person B moves always perpendicular to AB then that person goes around in a circle, always at the same radius from you.
O.K.
Now I understood that the perpendicular motion doesn't change the distance and the motion towards A along BA reduces the distance. This is how B meets A.

Thank you, haruspex. Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K