Convergence Time of Moving Points on an Equilateral Triangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irodov Kinematics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three points located at the vertices of an equilateral triangle, each moving towards the next point with a constant velocity. The inquiry focuses on determining the time it takes for these points to converge.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the geometry of the situation, questioning the nature of the shape formed as the points move. There is an exploration of the concept of radial speed and its implications for the convergence time. Some participants express confusion about specific terms and methods used in the initial analysis.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering insights into the nature of the problem and exploring alternative scenarios, such as the case of non-equilateral triangles. Suggestions for visualizing the problem through drawing and iterative steps have been provided, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced when the triangle is not equilateral, questioning how symmetry affects the convergence process. There is an acknowledgment of the potential difficulty in setting up equations for non-equilateral cases.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


Three points are located at the vertices of an equilateral triangle whose sides equals a. They all start moving simultaneously with velocity v constant in modulus, with the first point heading continually for the second, the second for the third, and the third for the first. How soon will the points converge?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I suppose this one is an easy problem, but i am still not sure if i did it the correct way. I found the original distance of a point from the centroid (where the points converge) which is a/√3 and the component of velocity along the line joining the centroid and a point is vcos(30°), therefore time taken by the points to converge is vcos(30°)/(a/√3)=2a/3v. This matches the answer given in the answer key but i don't understand why this method works here? What if it was not an equilateral triangle? Any explanation on this would help.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Pranav!

Suppose all 3 points have moved a little.
What does the resulting figure look like?
And what is the radial speed then?
 
Hello ILS! :smile:
I like Serena said:
Suppose all 3 points have moved a little.
What does the resulting figure look like?
It will be still an equilateral triangle.
ILS said:
And what is the radial speed then?
Um..i have no idea on this. :rolleyes:
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Hello ILS!

It will be still an equilateral triangle.

Yep!

Um..i have no idea on this.

No? So how did you get vcos(30°)?
 
I like Serena said:
No? So how did you get vcos(30°)?

I was confused when you said "radial speed". Sorry about that! :redface:
 
Pranav-Arora said:
I did not understand what you meant by radial speed. Sorry about that!

Ah yes, radial speed is the amount that the distance to the centroid gets shorter per unit of time.

So... does that answer your question?
 
I like Serena said:
Ah yes, radial speed is the amount that the distance to the centroid gets shorter per unit of time.

So... does that answer your question?

Thanks, but what about my second question? What would happen if the sides were unequal?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Thanks, but what about my second question? What would happen if the sides were unequal?

Oh yes. Completely missed that. Sorry.

Well, then it becomes a bit more complex doesn't it?
Then you can't use the symmetry anymore.

So what I'd do is draw a non-equilateral triangle - any triangle will do.
Say, a triangle with a base of 2 cm and 10 cm high?
Then take a step of a couple of millimeters in the proper directions and draw the new triangle.
Then repeat a couple of times.
That should give you a clue about what's happening...

Alternatively, you can set up equations and try and solve those.
But that is way more work, and you don't like a lot of work do you?

So I'd first try to draw a couple of steps and see if you can find a pattern.
At worst you'll have a pretty figure!
 
I like Serena said:
Well, then it becomes a bit more complex doesn't it?
Then you can't use the symmetry anymore.
I was expecting that.

ILS said:
So what I'd do is draw a non-equilateral triangle - any triangle will do.
Then take a step of a couple of millimeters in the proper directions and draw the new triangle.
Then repeat a couple of times.
That should give you a clue about what's happening...

Alternatively, you can set up equations and try and solve those.
Thanks for the tips, i would be sure to use your hints if i encounter any question like this. For now, i am off to bed, getting late here. :smile:

ILS said:
But that is way more work, and you don't like a lot of work do you?
Yes, i hate it. :-p
 
  • #10
Pranav-Arora said:
Yes, i hate it.

Ah, but you do like pretty pictures, don't you?
 
  • #11
I like Serena said:
Ah, but you do like pretty pictures, don't you?

Yes. :smile:
 
  • #12
Pranav-Arora said:
Yes.

Oh well, sleep tight and dream of rotating triangles that becomes smaller and smaller. :zzz:
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
26K