Three vectors are on the same plane

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Vectors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if three vectors $\overrightarrow{a}, \overrightarrow{b}, \overrightarrow{c}$ lie on the same plane, there exist coefficients $A, B, C$ (not all zero) such that $A \vec a + B \vec b + C \vec c = \vec 0$. The proof is structured around three cases: all vectors being the zero vector, all vectors being collinear with one non-zero vector, and two vectors being non-zero and non-collinear. Each case is essential for establishing the validity of the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector algebra and linear combinations
  • Knowledge of vector properties in a plane
  • Familiarity with the concept of linear dependence and independence
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and logic
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of linear combinations in vector spaces
  • Learn about linear dependence and independence of vectors
  • Explore geometric interpretations of vectors in a plane
  • Investigate the implications of the zero vector in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and anyone interested in understanding vector relationships and proofs in geometry.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We want to show that if $\overrightarrow{a}, \overrightarrow{b}, \overrightarrow{c}$ are on the same plane, then there are $A, B, C$ not all $0$ such that $A \vec a+B \vec b+C \vec c=\vec 0$.
The solution is the following:

If $\overrightarrow{a}, \overrightarrow{b}, \overrightarrow{c}$ are on the same plane, then
  1. all are equal to $\overrightarrow{0}$ and then $1 \cdot \overrightarrow{a} + 1 \cdot \overrightarrow{b}+ 1 \cdot \overrightarrow{c}=\overrightarrow{0}$

  2. all are on the same line and one is not the $\overrightarrow{0}$

    for example, $\overrightarrow{a} \neq \overrightarrow{0}$, so $\overrightarrow{b}=m \overrightarrow{a}, \overrightarrow{c}=n\overrightarrow{a}$ and then $-(m+n)\overrightarrow{a}+1\cdot \overrightarrow{b}+1 \overrightarrow{c}=\overrightarrow{0}$
  3. two are not the $\overrightarrow{0}$ and don't belong to the same line

    for example, the $\overrightarrow{b}, \overrightarrow{c}$, then $\overrightarrow{a}=x \overrightarrow{b}+y \overrightarrow{c}$ and then $1 \cdot \overrightarrow{a}+(-x) \overrightarrow{b}+(-y) \overrightarrow{c}=\overrightarrow{0}$.
Could you explain to me why we take these cases?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Could you explain to me why we take these cases?
Because it leads to a valid proof.
 
At the beginning we take the case if all the three verctors are the zero vector. Then when at least one of the three vectors is not the zero vector we take the cases if the vectors are at the same line or not. Is this correct?? (Wondering)

Why do we take at the second case: "all are on the same line and one is not the $\overrightarrow{0}$" that only one is not the zero vector and at the third case "two are not the $\overrightarrow{0}$ and don't belong to the same line" that two vectors are not the zero vector?? (Wondering) Can it not be that one is not the $\overrightarrow{0}$ and they don't belong to the same line?? (Wondering)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K