MHB Three vectors are on the same plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Vectors
Click For Summary
If vectors $\overrightarrow{a}, \overrightarrow{b}, \overrightarrow{c}$ are coplanar, there exist scalars $A, B, C$, not all zero, such that $A \overrightarrow{a} + B \overrightarrow{b} + C \overrightarrow{c} = \overrightarrow{0}$. The discussion explores three scenarios: all vectors being zero, all on the same line with one non-zero, and two non-zero vectors not on the same line. Each case is examined to demonstrate how they contribute to proving the coplanarity condition. Questions arise about the necessity of considering specific cases, particularly regarding the number of non-zero vectors and their alignment. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for establishing a valid proof of the theorem.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We want to show that if $\overrightarrow{a}, \overrightarrow{b}, \overrightarrow{c}$ are on the same plane, then there are $A, B, C$ not all $0$ such that $A \vec a+B \vec b+C \vec c=\vec 0$.
The solution is the following:

If $\overrightarrow{a}, \overrightarrow{b}, \overrightarrow{c}$ are on the same plane, then
  1. all are equal to $\overrightarrow{0}$ and then $1 \cdot \overrightarrow{a} + 1 \cdot \overrightarrow{b}+ 1 \cdot \overrightarrow{c}=\overrightarrow{0}$

  2. all are on the same line and one is not the $\overrightarrow{0}$

    for example, $\overrightarrow{a} \neq \overrightarrow{0}$, so $\overrightarrow{b}=m \overrightarrow{a}, \overrightarrow{c}=n\overrightarrow{a}$ and then $-(m+n)\overrightarrow{a}+1\cdot \overrightarrow{b}+1 \overrightarrow{c}=\overrightarrow{0}$
  3. two are not the $\overrightarrow{0}$ and don't belong to the same line

    for example, the $\overrightarrow{b}, \overrightarrow{c}$, then $\overrightarrow{a}=x \overrightarrow{b}+y \overrightarrow{c}$ and then $1 \cdot \overrightarrow{a}+(-x) \overrightarrow{b}+(-y) \overrightarrow{c}=\overrightarrow{0}$.
Could you explain to me why we take these cases?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Could you explain to me why we take these cases?
Because it leads to a valid proof.
 
At the beginning we take the case if all the three verctors are the zero vector. Then when at least one of the three vectors is not the zero vector we take the cases if the vectors are at the same line or not. Is this correct?? (Wondering)

Why do we take at the second case: "all are on the same line and one is not the $\overrightarrow{0}$" that only one is not the zero vector and at the third case "two are not the $\overrightarrow{0}$ and don't belong to the same line" that two vectors are not the zero vector?? (Wondering) Can it not be that one is not the $\overrightarrow{0}$ and they don't belong to the same line?? (Wondering)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K