Throwing a ball from the roof of a building

  • Thread starter Thread starter lando45
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Building
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the initial speed of a ball thrown horizontally from a 54-meter tall building, which lands 50 meters from the base. The key equations used include the motion equation d = d_o + V_o*t + (1/2)a*t^2 and the free fall equation d_f_a_l_l = 0.5g*t^2. The final calculated initial speed of the ball is approximately 15.069 m/s, derived from the time of fall and horizontal distance traveled. The calculations were confirmed to be correct by the user.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics equations of motion
  • Familiarity with gravitational acceleration (g = 9.81 m/s²)
  • Ability to solve square root equations
  • Knowledge of horizontal and vertical motion components
NEXT STEPS
  • Review projectile motion principles in physics
  • Learn about the use of TI-83 calculators for physics problems
  • Explore graphical methods to visualize motion equations
  • Study the derivation of equations of motion for different scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching motion concepts, and anyone interested in solving projectile motion problems.

lando45
Messages
84
Reaction score
1
A ball is thrown horizontally from the roof of a building 54 m tall and lands 50 m from the base. What was the ball's initial speed?

I have been set this question and I'm a little stuck...here is the information I have extracted from the question:

sv = -54
sh = 50
v = ?
a = -9.81

I don't know what else I can do, or what formulas/principles I should be using. I can't modulate with Pythagoras as surely the ball wouldn't travel downwards in a straight line to it's resting point...any help?

Much appreciated,
Rory
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(forenote, an underscore indicates a subscript)

You're familiar with the basic equation of motion relating distance to velocity and time, correct?
d = d_o + V_o*t+\frac{1}{2}a*t^2
where
d_o = original distance
V_o = original velocity
a = acceleration (in our case, gravity)
t = time

You have two unknown variables: Original Velocity and Time
Well, here's what you'd do.
V_o_x = V_o
V_o_y = 0

Because the ball has no initial vertical velocity component, you can solve for the free fall equation d_f_a_l_l = 0.5g*t^2
solving symbolicaly, we obtain t = \sqrt{\frac{2*d_f_a_l_l}{g}}
** Substitute your building height and g (9.81 m/s^2) into this equation and solve for time

Now you can use the second motion equation Distance = Velocity * Time to achieve the original horizontal velocity.

Look at it this way; the ball travels a known distance horizontally, and it does it in a known amount of time, because we know how long it would take for the ball to fall. Because there is no horizontal acceleration, we can solve the horizontal velocity equation relatively easily simply by setting:
V_o = d_h / t_f_a_l_l
which gives us
V_o = \frac{d_h}{\sqrt{\frac{2*d_f_a_l_l}{g}}}

I know it looks nasty, but it's really quite easy once you start getting some solid numeric values. I'll leave the calculations up to you.
 
Wow thanks for that. Ok so this is what I've done now:

t = sqrt [ (2 * d_fallen) / g ]
t = sqrt [ (2 * 54) / 9.81 ]
t = sqrt [ 108 / 9.81]
t = sqrt 11.009
t = 3.318

d_horizontal = vt
v = s / t
v = 50 / 3.318
v = 15.069

Does this seem like the correct answer? Cos I only have one submission for this question, and I really don't want to get it wrong, I want to know how to answer questions like this! So does 15.069 ms^-1 seem about right? Or have I gone wrong somewhere in my calculations...
 
Approximation, estimation, generalization

if you're unsure about your answer, you can do one of two things to check it...
A) Solve it backwards using your answer.
B) Graph it. It's easy, really... just set X as the time variable and d_y as the y variable, and you should easily be able to see if your answer for time @ y=0 is correct...
attachment.php?attachmentid=5735&stc=1&d=1133478133.png

Learn to love your TI-83, 83+, 86, 89... :approve:
 

Attachments

  • phys_temp.PNG
    phys_temp.PNG
    1.5 KB · Views: 2,532
ah thanks a lot i got the answer correct, much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K