I Tidal effects of galaxies orbiting one another with dark energy?

AI Thread Summary
A discussion emerged regarding the potential for a satellite galaxy to orbit a larger galaxy at a distance where gravitational forces and dark energy effects are balanced. Experts indicated that such a stable orbit could theoretically exist without external perturbations, but emphasized that a balanced state would not allow the satellite galaxy to maintain an orbit, as an inward force is necessary for orbital motion. Tidal effects between the two galaxies could still influence the orbits of planets within them, although these effects would likely be minimal. The gravitational and dark energy forces would vary across the satellite galaxy, leading to slight modifications in planetary orbits. Overall, while the concept of a balanced orbit is intriguing, practical implications suggest limited tidal interactions.
Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR Summary
Tidal effects of galaxies orbiting one another in presence of dark energy?
I recently found a question in a physics discussion site [1] about whether there was a "distance" between two galaxies where both the gravitational force and the influence of dark energy would be balanced. The answers and comments seem to indicate that there is indeed such a "radius" around a galaxy.

I was very interested in this, so I contacted the authors of this paper [2] about this phenomenon. I asked them if it could be possible to have a satellite galaxy orbiting a bigger one just in the point where there would be a balance between the gravitational attraction of the bigger galaxy and dark energy, so that the satellite galaxy orbit would not decay (through gravitational waves, tidal forces...) and avoiding its fall eventually towards the bigger galaxy.

They replied that the answer was basically yes, and that they could keep that orbit as long as there was no external perturbation modifying these orbits. But I had one more question about this scenario. My question is:

If that balanced state would be possible, would there still be tidal effects between the two galaxies (So that some of the orbits of planets and stars inside the galaxies could be somewhat modified) but without making the orbits of the galaxies decay over time...?

I mean, imagine a satellite galaxy orbits a bigger galaxy just in the radius distance where the influence of gravity and dark energy are balanced out. Is it physically possible (at least theoretically) that the tidal forces between the galaxies may affect some of the planetary systems' orbits in these galaxies (for example changing the orbits of planets around their stars like for example making them orbit their stars further apart)?

And would these tidal forces disrupt the satellite galaxy from the distance where gravity and dark energy are balanced out? Or without any external perturbation, it should keep orbiting at that distance (even with these tidal forces between the galaxies or the gravitational waves emitted from the orbits around the bigger galaxy)?[1]: https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...ional-source-where-the-influence-of-gravity-a

[2]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1433
 
Space news on Phys.org
Suekdccia said:
TL;DR Summary: Tidal effects of galaxies orbiting one another in presence of dark energy?

I mean, imagine a satellite galaxy orbits a bigger galaxy just in the radius distance where the influence of gravity and dark energy are balanced out. Is it physically possible (at least theoretically) that the tidal forces between the galaxies may affect some of the planetary systems' orbits in these galaxies (for example changing the orbits of planets around their stars like for example making them orbit their stars further apart)?
How much of an effect on the orbits of planets are you expecting at that radial distance?
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
Suekdccia said:
if it could be possible to have a satellite galaxy orbiting a bigger one just in the point where there would be a balance between the gravitational attraction of the bigger galaxy and dark energy, so that the satellite galaxy orbit would not decay
If there is such a balance, the smaller galaxy won't orbit the larger one. In the Newtonian picture you are using, there has to be an unbalanced inward force on the satellite galaxy for it to orbit the larger galaxy.

The paper you reference recognizes this when it says (p. 2) "The gravitationally bound system can exist only within the sphere of this radius [the radius at which the forces balance]".

Suekdccia said:
If that balanced state would be possible, would there still be tidal effects between the two galaxies
Again using the Newtonian picture, this will obviously be the case in principle since galaxies are extended objects and both the ordinary gravitational force and the dark energy force will vary over the extent of the satellite galaxy. In practice the effects are likely to be quite small (the paper you reference gives formulas you can use to run the numbers if you care to).
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top